Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Crosby v. Crosby, 587 N.W.2d 292.

99 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Andrew James Carl Trupe v. Christin Marie Sohns Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“An award of attorney fees rests almost entirely within the 8 discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Todd Emil Nelson v. Leslie Ann Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Todd Emil Nelson v. Leslie Ann Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
–97 (Minn. App. 1998), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Pettey v. Melissa Denise Pettey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Pettey v. Melissa Denise Pettey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 292, 298 (Minn. App. 1998), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Larson v. Brian Allen Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Larson v. Brian Allen Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
14, 2006); (explaining that, although appellant’s citation of facts might prompt another fact-finder to reach different findings, sufficient contradictory evidence reasonably supported the district court’s findings), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
4 “An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “[a]n award of attorney fees rests almost entirely within the discretion of the [district] court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Rory Lane Smoot v. Jacqueline Ann Smoot Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Rory Lane Smoot v. Jacqueline Ann Smoot Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In a dissolution case, the issue of attorney fees “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Kerr v. Kerr 770 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Kerr v. Kerr 770 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See, review denied (Minn. Feb.
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Attorney Fees and Late Filings “An award of attorney fees rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Schallinger v. Schallinger 699 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Schallinger v. Schallinger 699 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
1 (2004), “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Sirek v. Sirek 693 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Sirek v. Sirek 693 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Finally, while the district court must make a just and equitable division of the marital property, “[a]n equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 642 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 642 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Ludwigson v. Ludwigson 642 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Ludwigson v. Ludwigson 642 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
1 (2000), “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Prolife Minnesota v. Minnesota Pro-Life Committee 632 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Prolife Minnesota v. Minnesota Pro-Life Committee 632 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“The function of a [TRO] * * * is to preserve the status quo until opportunity is afforded to decide the matter on the merits.” (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Maurer v. Maurer 607 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Maurer v. Maurer 607 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See, e.g., Elliott v. Mitchell, 311 Minn. 533, 535 , (affirming trial court’s findings despite admitting “the evidence might [have] supported] another conclusion”); (stating that although appellant’s recitation of facts “might prompt another trier of fact to different findings, because there is sufficient contradictory evidence to reasonably support the trial court’s findings,” appellant’s evidence “does not render the trial court’s findings clearly erroneous
Marriage of Rogers v. Rogers 606 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Rogers v. Rogers 606 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State, County of St. Louis Ex Rel. Rimolde v. Tinker 601 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State, County of St. Louis Ex Rel. Rimolde v. Tinker 601 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(although mother designated primary physical custodian, award of dependency exemption to father upheld where physical care of children was equally divided between parents, where mother had greater financial resources, and where exemption was of no benefit to her because her primary source of incom

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by