Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Professionals, Inc., 628 N.W.2d 173.

36 citing documents.

Stacy Demskie, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Pros, Inc., rev. granted (Minn. July 24, 2001) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Dr. Eric Steffen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Inc., rev. granted (Minn. July 24, 2001) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
William M. Ross, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(citing Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof’ls , d 173, 186 (Minn. App. 2001) , review granted, appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Gerring Properties Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Prof’l. , (noting that “[t]ypical close-corporation shareholders commonly have an expectation of continuing employment with the corporation” and “because of the unique characteristics of close corporations, employment is often a vital component of a close -corporation shareholder’s return o n investme
Kathryn Ward Blum, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Prof’ls , Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Daniel Call, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Prof’ls, Inc., for the proposition that Daniel can be fired as an employee even though he is also a shareholder.
Jeffery D. Gordon, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Prof’ls, Inc. , (quotation omitted) , review granted (Minn. Jul.
A18-0391 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Prof’ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Lund v. Lund 924 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Lund v. Lund 924 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Computer Prof'ls., Inc. , , 186 (Minn. App. 2001) ; Berreman v. W. Pub.
Damian Loth, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Prof’ls, Inc., d 173, 191 (Minn. App. 2001), review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Edna Ruth Albertson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Computer Professionals, Inc. , review dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
That fiduciary duty includes the duty to deal “openly, honestly and fairly with other shareholders,” id., and to “act with complete candor in their negotiations with each other,” Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof'ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Stieler v. Stieler, 244 Minn. 312, 319, (ruling that a proper clarification of a judgment “involves neither an amendment of its terms nor a challenge to its validity”); see also Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof’ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Prof’ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Joy Folie v. Aging Joyfully, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joy Folie v. Aging Joyfully, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Minnesota, “[w]hether a shareholder’s reasonable expectations have been frustrated is essentially a fact issue.” Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof’ls, Inc., review 6 granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof’ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Gerald J. Hansen v. N'compass Solutions Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gerald J. Hansen v. N'compass Solutions Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Unfairly prejudicial conduct is “conduct that frustrates the reasonable expectations of all shareholders.” Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof’ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Samuel Deweese, (A13-2152), (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd., (A13-2152), (A13-2160). Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Samuel Deweese, (A13-2152), (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd., (A13-2152), (A13-2160). Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The common law fiduciary duty between shareholders is frequently defined in caselaw as a “duty of good faith and fair dealing.” See Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof’ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 788 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 788 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“The legislature enacted section 302A.751 in 1981 in recognition that, given the lack of a ready market for their shares, minority shareholders in closely held corporations required enhanced protections.” Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof's, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Kvidera v. Rotation Engineering & Manufacturing Co. 705 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Kvidera v. Rotation Engineering & Manufacturing Co. 705 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Minnesota law presumes that employment for an indefinite duration is at will.” appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
See Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Profls, Inc., -84 (Minn.App.2001).
Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLC 689 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLC 689 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof'ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.
Haley v. Forcelle 669 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Haley v. Forcelle 669 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Prof'ls, Inc., review granted (Minn. July 24, 2001), and appeal dismissed (Minn. Aug.