Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Amos, 658 N.W.2d 201.

489 citing documents.

State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Lushenko 714 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Lushenko 714 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the [district] court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
State v. Zulu 706 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Zulu 706 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the trial court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citations omitted).
State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Huff v. State 698 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2005
Huff v. State 698 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2005
State v. Lasnetski 696 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Lasnetski 696 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 691 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 691 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the trial court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citations omitted).
State v. Scacchetti 690 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Scacchetti 690 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Bobadilla 690 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bobadilla 690 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the trial court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citations omitted).
In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Wright 686 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Wright 686 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Whittle 685 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Whittle 685 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Plantin 682 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Plantin 682 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the trial court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citation omitted).
State v. Courtney 682 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park 682 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Courtney 682 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the trial court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citations omitted).
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park 682 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hadgu 681 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hadgu 681 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“Evi-dentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
State v. Al-Naseer 678 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bernardi 678 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bernardi 678 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the trial court abused its discretion and that the appellant was thereby prejudiced;” (citation omitted).
State v. Al-Naseer 678 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Moua 678 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 2004
State v. Moua 678 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 2004