Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Papadakis, 643 N.W.2d 349.

78 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jack Kramer Allen, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
To satisfy this element, the record must establish that Allen “had actual knowledge of the nature of the substance[,]” (quotation omitted), or knew that the substance was illegal.
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. Brenda Kay Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
failed to provide a substantial basis for a probable cause determination.” Olson acknowledges that this court previously held that contraband seized from garbage left for collection can provide an independent and substantial basis for a probable cause 6 d at 543, d 349, 356 (Minn. App. 2002).
State of Minnesota v. T. K. S Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. T. K. S Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(expungements); -57 (Minn. App. 2002) (omnibus rulings).
State of Minnesota v. Adam Dale Muellner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Adam Dale Muellner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We have held that “[a]lthough the rules of criminal procedure do not specifically authorize motions for reconsideration of omnibus rulings, the district court has the inherent authority to consider such a motion.” - 57 (Minn. App. 2002).
State of Minnesota v. Craig Ryan Schwoboda Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Craig Ryan Schwoboda Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that convicting the defendant of multiple controlled substance crimes, each conviction for a different controlled substance, was proper); see also Minn. Stat. 609.035, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that marijuana residue in garbage supported a search warrant for the house).
State of Minnesota v. Todd Timothy Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Todd Timothy Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Larry Jermaine McCool Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Zacarias Lopez Sarmiento Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Zacarias Lopez Sarmiento Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Larry Jermaine McCool Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Marsenior Pede Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Marsenior Pede Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“To sustain a conviction, the state must prove all essential elements of the charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Ali 775 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Ali 775 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. McGrath 706 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. McGrath 706 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Skipintheday 704 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Skipintheday 704 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(when criminal conduct arises from a single behavioral incident, multiple convictions are permissible but multiple sentences are not).
State v. Senske 692 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Senske 692 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 2005