Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Olhausen, 681 N.W.2d 21.

124 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. David Lee King Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee King Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellant cites Minnesota Supreme Court caselaw observing, in controlled-substance cases, that a “defendant’s own personal belief of and representations of the substance as a controlled substance was not sufficient to 4 prove identity.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[W]he[n] the identification of the drug is in question, the sufficiency of the evidence is examined on a case-by-case basis.”
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Phillip Anthony Roberts v. State of Minnesota 856 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
28 (Minn. 2004) (holding that “non-scientific evidence presented at trial relating to the identity and weight of a controlled substance”—including defendant’s and co-conspirator’s statements regarding the identity and weight of the substance, along with a police officer’s opinion as to the drug’s authenticity
State v. Knoch 781 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Enoch 781 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Enoch 781 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Knoch 781 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Hussong 739 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Hussong 739 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Probable cause requires only “a probability or substantial chance of criminal activity, not an actual showing of such activity.” -91 (Minn.1999) (quotation omitted); (“The standard for the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction is greater than probable cause.”).
Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency 728 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2007
Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency 728 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2007
State v. Caulfield 722 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2006
State v. Caulfield 722 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2006
The court of appeals rested its harmless error determination, in part, stating that the identity of a substance may be proven by circumstantial evidence and officer testimony without scientific testing.
State v. Colbert 716 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 2006
State v. Colbert 716 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 2006
State v. Pendleton 706 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2005
State v. Pendleton 706 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2005
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005