DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. McAdoo, 330 N.W.2d 104.

97 citing documents.

  • State v. Hartfield 459 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Hartfield 459 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
    (assault with a dangerous weapon and attempted robbery were part of same behavioral incident because assault was in furtherance of the robbery) (attempted robbery and assault with a dangerous weapon were not part of same behavioral incident because defendant fired gun at police after making decision to “get” them, not to facilitate commission of robbery or of escape from apprehension).
  • State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    See Bixby, d at 394 ( the “precise issue” was whether the sentencing court’s determination that the underlying conduct was divisible was supported by the record.)
  • State v. Axford 419 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Axford 419 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Dixon 415 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Dixon 415 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Because the state did not have copies of his out-of-state misdemeanor convictions, appellant claims the state did not meet its burden of “establishing the facts necessary to justify consideration of out-of-state convictions in determining a defendant’s criminal history score.” (citing Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.B.5).
  • State v. Parr 414 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Parr 414 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.B.5.
  • State v. Bobo 414 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Bobo 414 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    The positive identification by the Country Store cashier is sufficient to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Bobo participated in the Spreigl crime, “[b]earing in mind that proof by clear and convincing evidence is not as high a standard as proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • State v. Kasper 409 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Kasper 409 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Perez 397 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Perez 397 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See (crimes four months apart); (crimes one night apart); (crimes remarkably similar and one month apart); (signature modus operandi); State v. Elli, 267 Minn. 185 , (crimes in identical location, robber similarly masked and armed
  • State v. Sutherlin 396 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Sutherlin 396 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Sutherlin 393 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Sutherlin 393 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Campa 390 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Campa 390 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hatton 389 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Alexander 388 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Alexander 388 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hatton 389 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Norregaard 384 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Norregaard 384 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1986
    (assault with a dangerous weapon and attempted robbery were part of same behavioral incident because assault was in furtherance of the robbery) (attempted robbery *450 and assault with a dangerous weapon were not part of same behavioral incident because defendant fired gun at police after making decision to “get” them, not to facilitate commission of robbery or of escape from apprehension).
  • State v. Olson 379 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Yanez 373 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Yanez 373 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    The State has the burden of establishing the facts necessary to justify consideration of foreign convictions
  • State v. Vann 372 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Vann 372 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Appellant’s and Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.B.505.
  • State v. Craig 359 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Craig 359 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 358 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 358 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Kutchara 350 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Kutchara 350 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1984
    we upheld the decision of the sentencing judge in that case giving the defendant points for both attempted robbery and for shooting at police where the record indicated that the defendant did not fire his gun to facilitate the commission of the crime or his escape but fired it after making a decision to “
  • Bixby v. State 344 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1984
  • Bixby v. State 344 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1984
    are instructive as to the procedures that should be followed.
  • State v. Griffin 336 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Griffin 336 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1983
    we stated that the state has the burden at a sentencing hearing of establishing the facts necessary to justify consideration of out-of-state convictions in determining a defendant’s criminal history score.
  • State v. Russell 330 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Russell 330 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1983
    This is an issue which we have confronted numerous times, which cites a number of the other cases.