Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rettman v. City of Litchfield, 354 N.W.2d 426.

36 citing documents.

Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
is the premise that there must exist some evidence to support the verdict”); (reversing jury verdict because evidence was “practically conclusive against the jury finding” on question of fact).
Lester Building Systems v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 761 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 2009
Lester Building Systems v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 761 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 2009
When a district court has denied a motion for JNOV, on appellate review, we must “affirm if there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict.”
Taney v. Independent School District No. 624 673 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Taney v. Independent School District No. 624 673 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 615 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2000
Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 615 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2000
Where a district court has denied a party’s motion for JNOV, we will uphold the court’s decision if “there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict.”
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 614 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 2000
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 614 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 2000
‘Unless the evidence is practically conclusive against the verdict, [this court] will not set the verdict aside.’ ” () (other citations omitted).
Frykman v. University of Minnesota-Duluth 611 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Frykman v. University of Minnesota-Duluth 611 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
We must affirm the denial “if there is.any competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict.” (citation omitted).
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 588 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 588 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Baker v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger 588 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Baker v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger 588 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Pouliot v. Fitzsimmons 582 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1998
Pouliot v. Fitzsimmons 582 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1998
‘Unless the evidence is practically- conclusive against the verdict, [this court] will not set the verdict aside.’ ” () (other citations omitted).
Wong v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 562 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wong v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 562 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In reviewing the denial of JNOV, this court must affirm if the record contains “any competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict.”
Doe v. Redeemer Lutheran Church 531 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Doe v. Redeemer Lutheran Church 531 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
M.L. v. Magnuson 531 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
M.L. v. Magnuson 531 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
We must affirm the trial court’s decision to deny a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict “if there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict.” (citations omitted).
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
We must affirm a decision to deny a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict “if there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict.” (citation omitted).
Gilman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 526 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gilman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 526 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Beck v. American Sharecom, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Beck v. American Sharecom, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by