Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Boline v. Doty, 345 N.W.2d 285.

30 citing documents.

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman 749 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman 749 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
An attorney lien traces its origins to common law, but the Minnesota legislature “has long since preempted this field and has substituted statutory procedures.”
Bohlke v. Giebel 745 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Financing Statement in Dist. Court 745 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Bohlke v. Giebel 745 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Financing Statement in Dist. Court 745 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Thomas A. Foster & Associates, Ltd. v. Paulson 699 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Thomas A. Foster & Associates, Ltd. v. Paulson 699 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Granse & Associates, Inc. v. Kimm 529 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Granse & Associates, Inc. v. Kimm 529 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Bonner v. Showa Denko, K.K. 518 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re L-Tryptophan Cases 518 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re L-Tryptophan Cases 518 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
B. Separate Equitable Proceeding BJLS contends, that the district court erred in summarily ordering enforcement of RKMC's liens absent an equitable proceeding brought by appellant for such purpose.
Bonner v. Showa Denko, K.K. 518 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
B. Separate Equitable Proceeding BJLS contends, that the district court erred in summarily ordering enforcement of RKMC’s hens absent an equitable proceeding brought by appellant for such purpose.
Host v. Host 497 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Host v. Host 497 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(citing In re Estate of Eggert, 245 Minn. 401 , ).
St. Cloud National Bank & Trust Co. v. Brutger 488 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
St. Cloud National Bank & Trust Co. v. Brutger 488 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Akers v. Akers, 233 Minn. 138, 138
First Bank National Ass'n v. Northside Mercury Sales & Service, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
First Bank National Ass'n v. Northside Mercury Sales & Service, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Gaughan v. Gaughan 450 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Gaughan v. Gaughan 450 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State ex rel. Bouza v. Gregg 435 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State ex rel. Bouza v. Gregg 435 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(due process requires the state to afford a meaningful opportunity to be heard); (due process was not denied where appellants had “full hearings * * * [and] the opportunity to present witnesses and other evidence.”).
Ryan and Vanderheyden v. Bagne 429 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ryan and Vanderheyden v. Bagne 429 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Clark 375 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Clark 375 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The statute grants an attorney’s charging lien on “the cause of action and on the client’s interest in any money or property involved in or affected by any action or proceeding in which he may have been employed, and on the judgment.”
Roehrdanz v. Schlink 368 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Roehrdanz v. Schlink 368 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1985