Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez, 341 N.W.2d 294.
- McDonnell v. Anytime Temporaries 349 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- McDonnell v. Anytime Temporaries 349 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Hines v. Sheraton Ritz Hotel 349 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Hines v. Sheraton Ritz Hotel
349 N.W.2d 329
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Group Health Plan, Inc., v. Lopez
- Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Benson v. Iowa Beef Processors 348 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Brunello v. Mill City Auto Body 348 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Reed 348 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Benson v. Iowa Beef Processors
348 N.W.2d 394
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co., 295 Minn. 372, 375 , *397 Group Health Plan
- Brunello v. Mill City Auto Body 348 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Reed
348 N.W.2d 387
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
f standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employee, or in carelessness or negligence of such degree or recurrence as to manifest equal culpability, wrongful intent or evil design, or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to his employer [[Image here]] Group Health Plan, (citing Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co., 295 Minn. 372, 375 , ).
- LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline 348 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline
348 N.W.2d 805
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citing Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., ); see also Group Health Plan
- Wicker Enterprises, Inc. v. Dahler 347 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Wicker Enterprises, Inc. v. Dahler 347 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Mastley v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Mastley v. Commissioner of Economic Security
347 N.W.2d 515
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., Group Health Plan
- Dawson v. Northland Beverages, Inc. 347 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Dawson v. Northland Beverages, Inc.
347 N.W.2d 287
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., Group Health Plan
- Schmidt v. City of Duluth 346 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Schmidt v. City of Duluth
346 N.W.2d 671
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Judicial review of decisions in economic security cases is extremely limit *674 ed. Group Health Plan
- Blau v. Masters Restaurant Associates, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Blau v. Masters Restaurant Associates, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Hoemberg v. Watco Publishers, Inc. 343 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Hoemberg v. Watco Publishers, Inc.
343 N.W.2d 676
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
This court has applied the Tilseth standard in misconduct cases such as Group Health Plan
- Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion Project 343 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion Project
343 N.W.2d 43
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
failure in good performance as the result of inability or incapacity, inad-vertencies or ordinary negligence in isolated instances, or good-faith errors in judgment or discretion are not to be deemed “misconduct.” Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co., 295 Minn. 372, 375 , This court has applied the Tilseth standard in misconduct cases such as Group Health Plan
- King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
King v. Little Italy
341 N.W.2d 896
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564 , expanded the definition of misconduct to include any actions that demonstrate a lack of concern for one’s job, and in Group Health Plan, (Minn.Ct.App., Dec.