Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite County of Anoka v. Richards, 345 N.W.2d 263.

31 citing documents.

Putz v. Putz 645 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2002
Putz v. Putz 645 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2002
Schaefer v. Weber 567 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1997
Schaefer v. Weber 567 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1997
In 1984, -67 (Minn.App.1984)
Marriage of Otto v. Otto 472 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Otto v. Otto 472 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Anderson v. Anderson 470 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department ex rel. Noren v. Kunza 465 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department ex rel. Noren v. Kunza 465 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Miller 446 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Miller 446 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
§ 256.87 has been identified as an action which is totally separate from an order for child support, -67 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), that statute incorporates reference to the support provisions of chapter 518.
County of Nicollet v. Larson 421 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1988
County of Nicollet v. Larson 421 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1988
There can be no doubt that “the primary obligation of support of a child should fall on the parent and the County should only be expected to contribute to the extent that the parent is unable.” see Haugen v. Swanson, 222 Minn. 203, 206
State, County of Clay Ex Rel. Hendrickson v. Hendrickson 403 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, County of Clay Ex Rel. Hendrickson v. Hendrickson 403 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
County of Ramsey v. Shir 403 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
County of Ramsey v. Shir 403 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Ex Rel. Region VIII North Welfare Ex Rel. Evans v. Evans 402 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Ex Rel. Region VIII North Welfare Ex Rel. Evans v. Evans 402 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department Ex Rel. Edwardh v. Swanson 394 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department Ex Rel. Edwardh v. Swanson 394 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
contribution was sought on April 28, 1983.
Hennepin County v. Geshick 387 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hennepin County v. Geshick 387 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Maskrey v. Maskrey 380 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Maskrey v. Maskrey 380 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(judgment awarded by trial court was beyond father’s reasonable ability to pay where he worked only periodically, earning little money); (same); (father was able to reimburse the county where he had a job and was receiving veterans’ benefits).
Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 372 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 372 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
County of Isanti v. Formhals 358 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
County of Isanti v. Formhals 358 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
County of Lake Ex Rel. Hungerford v. Hungerford 356 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
County of Lake Ex Rel. Hungerford v. Hungerford 356 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
this court held that a determination that the father *407 was able to reimburse the county was reasonable where the father had a job and was receiving veterans’ benefits.