Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mattsen v. Packman, 358 N.W.2d 48.
- Helgeson v. Gisselbeck 375 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Helgeson v. Gisselbeck 375 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Percy v. Hofius 370 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Percy v. Hofius
370 N.W.2d 490
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
as authority for vacating the conciliation court judgment under Minn.R.Civ.P.
- Hennepin County Welfare Board v. Schultz 359 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Hennepin County Welfare Board v. Schultz 359 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Hammer v. Soderberg 358 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1984
-
Hammer v. Soderberg
358 N.W.2d 53
Minn. 1984
released today, and under the facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the judgment under Rule 60.02(6) of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure.