Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bixby v. State, 344 N.W.2d 390.

22 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Michael Lavale Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(citing Bixby v. State , -94 (Minn. 1984)).
Marlow Shelton McDonald v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
in which the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a defendant’s two acts of sexual intercourse that occurred at different places in one evening arose out of a single behavioral incident because there had been “just one basic incident of wrongdoin g that took place at two different locations in one
State of Minnesota v. Milo Calvin Ojohn Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 390 (Minn. 1984), the defendant was convicted of two counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct, but the supreme court held th at “there was just one basic incident of wrongdoing that took place at two diffe rent locations in one evening.” Id.
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Frances Phillips-Marrow Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The second case is Bixby v. State
State of Minnesota v. Sandy Woodrow Yancy Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Marlow Vincent Labatte, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Bixby v. State , State v. Herberg
State of Minnesota v. Brock Lawrence Altringer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Mo Savoy Hicks 864 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2015
State v. Jude 514 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1994
State v. Jude 514 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1994
-36 (Minn.1987); -94 (Minn.1984)
State v. Clark 486 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Clark 486 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Secrest 437 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Secrest 437 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(defendant drove a short distance between two sexual contacts; court held the two acts were part of a single behavioral incident); (multiple sentencing for two acts of sexual penetration barred by § 609.035 because, although the contacts occurred in two separate
Pladson v. State 385 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pladson v. State 385 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(petitioner challenged computation of 1982 criminal history score based on 1977 offenses).
State v. Kutchara 350 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1984
State v. Kutchara 350 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1984
Ture v. State 353 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1984
Ture v. State 353 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1984