Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Richardson, 393 N.W.2d 657.

36 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
N.W.2d 566, 583 (Minn. 2009) (stating that evidence that the defendant chased the victim, took aim, and fired nine shots supported the jury’s determination of premeditation); (determining that a finding of premeditation was supported when the defendant had grabbed a gun, ran across a street, and shot his victim); (concluding that there was sufficient evidence to support premeditation when the “defendant had to make the decision to chase after [the victim] and fire the last two or three shots”).
De-Aunteze Lavion Bobo, Minn. 2022
See, e.g., Campbell, d at 507 (noting that while “the affidavit is notarized, it contains multiple layers of hearsay”); Jackson v. State , –78 (Minn. 2016) (refusing to admit a witness’s written statement under Rule 804(b)(3) after he asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self -incrimination); Ferguson, d at 812 –13 (same); State v. Richardson , –67 (Minn. 1986) (same).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
This was a 29 permissible consideration, given that premeditation can be formed in a matter of “moments,” and was one of many factors considered by the district court when imposing the consecutive sentences.
State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox 884 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Fox 868 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Fox 868 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2015
While a “series of shots or blows” does not itself support a finding of premeditation, numerous blows can indicate premeditation when supported by additional evidence, such as evidence of a “long and severe attack.” ().
Ferguson v. State 826 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2013
Ferguson v. State 826 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2013
See, -70 (Minn.2012) (evaluating the other evidence in the case); -67 (Minn.1986) (assessing the other evidence presented at trial and the declarant’s relationship with the appellant); (examining the overall credibility of the declarant and the relationships of the parties involved in the case); State v. Higginbotham, 298 Minn. 1
State v. Ortega 813 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 2012
State v. Ortega 813 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 2012
State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
State v. Vang 774 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2009
State v. Vang 774 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2009
State v. Holliday 745 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 2008
State v. Holliday 745 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 2008
The nature of the killing in this case is similar to the nature of the killings in McArthur
State v. Hall 722 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2006
State v. Hall 722 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2006
State v. Moua 678 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 2004
State v. Moua 678 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 2004
State v. Gowdy, 262 Minn. 70, 75
State v. Cooper 561 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1997
State v. Cooper 561 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1997
State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
-63 (Minn.1986) (premeditated murder).
State v. Moore 481 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1992
State v. Moore 481 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1992
State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Kelly 435 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1989
State v. Kelly 435 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1989
State v. Alton 432 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1988
State v. Alton 432 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1988
State v. Buchanan 431 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1988
State v. Buchanan 431 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1988
State v. Roy 408 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Roy 408 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(quoting State v. Boyce, 284 Minn. 242, 254 , ).