Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Herrly v. Muzik, 374 N.W.2d 275.

32 citing documents.

State v. Scovel 916 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
State v. Scovel 916 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
But that does not mean that such subsequent legislative history is wholly irrelevant...."); Herrly v. Muzik , , 279 (Minn. 1985) (noting that "subsequent legislative history as a source for divining earlier [legislative] intent must be employed with caution," but that "we cannot blind ourselves to ...
Friedlander v. Edwards Lifesciences, LLC 900 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2017
Friedlander v. Edwards Lifesciences, LLC 900 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2017
The parties submitted supplemental briefs regarding the applicability of two cases, and K.R.
Urban v. American Legion Department of Minnesota 723 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
Urban v. American Legion Department of Minnesota 723 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
The CDA may be “liberally construed” where its “provisions are clear as to intent and purpose,” but must be “strictly construed in the sense that it cannot be enlarged beyond its definite scope.” Beck, 245 Minn. at 34 , d at 891 ; see Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc.
K.R. v. Sanford 605 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2000
K.R. v. Sanford 605 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2000
Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In contrast, third persons are protected under the Act through liberal interpretation ‘“so as to suppress the mischief and advance the remedy.’ ” Lefto, d at 857 ().
K.R. v. Sanford 588 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
K.R. v. Sanford 588 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
While the district court characterized the issue as one of standing, defining standing as "a convenient term to denote a person entitled to maintain an action under the Civil Damage Act,” the complicity defense has been described by the supreme court as "an absolute bar to recovery.”
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc. 581 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1998
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc. 581 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1998
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
1 (1994); (quoting Randall v. Village of Excelsior, 258 Minn. 81, 83 , ).
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1991
Criticized Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1991
Co., in regard to the amount of temporary partial disability compensation where an employee is working at a reduced-wage job); ( regarding the preemption of the dram shop field by the Civil Damages Act); (declining to adhere to Wasche v. Milbank
Bushland v. Corner Pocket Billiard Lounge of Moorhead, Inc. 462 N.W.2d 615 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bushland v. Corner Pocket Billiard Lounge of Moorhead, Inc. 462 N.W.2d 615 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paulson v. Lapa, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paulson v. Lapa, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hannah v. Chmielewski, Inc., 323 *
Minnegasco, Inc. v. County of Carver 447 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1989
Minnegasco, Inc. v. County of Carver 447 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1989
(caution must be exercised in using subsequent legislative history to di *882 vine earlier legislative intent).
Nelson v. Larsen 405 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Larsen 405 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Spragg v. Shuster 398 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Spragg v. Shuster 398 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The trial court found that appellant was barred from recovery under the doctrine of complicity under Turk v. Long Branch Saloon, 280 Minn. 438 , rehearing denied (Minn. Oct.
Del E. Webb v. Superior Court of Arizona 726 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1986
Kuiawinski v. Palm Garden Bar 392 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 1986