Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 371 N.W.2d 552.

102 citing documents.

Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department 54 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Rose v. Commissioner of Public Safety 637 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Rose v. Commissioner of Public Safety 637 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Richardson 622 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 2001
State v. Richardson 622 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 2001
Safety, in which we held that an anonymous citizen report of a possibly drunken driver, giving the vehicle’s license plate number and vehicle’s location and direction of travel, did not provide reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop.
Jobe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 609 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jobe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 609 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Safety, (rejecting argument that reasonable suspicion may be based only on officer’s personal observation).
Tracht v. Commissioner of Public Safety 592 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Tracht v. Commissioner of Public Safety 592 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Safety, -56 (Minn.1985) (affirming order rescinding revocation of driver’s license when evidence of the driver’s intoxication was obtained as the result of a Fourth Amendment violation); Ascher v. Commissioner of Pub.
State v. Hjelmstad 535 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Hjelmstad 535 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Pealer 488 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Pealer 488 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Pharo v. Tucson City Court 810 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Piotrowski v. Commissioner of Public Safety 453 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1990
State v. Stabler 783 P.2d 816 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Playle v. Commissioner of Public Safety 439 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Playle v. Commissioner of Public Safety 439 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In contrast, nothing was known about the informant or what led him to believe the driver was possibly drunk.
Klotz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Klotz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Schwartz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 422 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Schwartz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 422 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
the supreme court held a stop improper when an unidentified person reported “possibly a drunken driver,” and gave the car’s direction of travel, description and license plate number.
City of Minnetonka v. Shepherd 420 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1988
City of Minnetonka v. Shepherd 420 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1988
Suppressing the test results and all the other evidence obtained as a result of the arrest in the misdemeanor criminal prosecution that resulted
State v. Lipinski 419 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Lipinski 419 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
*653 appellant next argues that the seizure was not justified because it was based solely upon the tip from the doctor at the treatment center.
Norman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Norman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(anonymous tip lacked minimal indicia of reliability, where driver provided no specific and articulable facts to support bare assertion of a possibly drunk driver on the road).
Sjodin v. Commissioner of Public Safety 401 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sjodin v. Commissioner of Public Safety 401 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
: The fourth amendment stands as a protection against unreasonable intrusions on an individual’s privacy and personal security, and if this protection is to have any efficacy, it applies here.
State v. Davis 393 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1986
State v. Davis 393 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1986
was controlling and it distinguished Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety
State v. Newgard 392 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Newgard 392 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ANALYSIS Appellant argues that the anonymous tip failed to provide “the requisite reasonable suspicion for an investigative stop of suspected ongoing criminal conduct.” (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct.
State v. Davis 390 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Davis 390 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schulberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 387 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schulberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 387 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frank v. Commissioner of Public Safety 384 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frank v. Commissioner of Public Safety 384 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Blaisdell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 381 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1986
Blaisdell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 381 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1986
State v. Teigen 381 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Teigen 381 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Blaisdell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Blaisdell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Giebenhain 374 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Giebenhain 374 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
at 304, d at 911 (quoting People v. Ingle, 36 N.Y.2d 413, 420 , 330 N.E.2d 39, 44 , 369 N.Y.S.2d 67, 74 (1975))

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by