Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Aarsvold, 376 N.W.2d 518.

35 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Aarsvold , superseded by statute, 1987 Minn. Laws ch. 176, § 1, at 373 (codified at Minn. Stat. § 609.195(b) (Supp. 1987)); see also Carithers, d at 621 (discussing Aarsvold).
State v. Ruoho 685 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Ruoho 685 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
When a complaint is dismissed for lack of probable cause, critical impact exists if the dismissal “effectively prevent[s] further prosecutions and [makes] reissuing of the complaints pointless.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Welfare of C.M.A. 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re CMA 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re CMA 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
1987); review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Welfare of C.M.A. 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
1987); review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Anderson 666 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2003
State v. Anderson 666 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2003
.The felonies that traditionally supported a felony-murder conviction were: "homicide, mayhem, rape, arson, robbery, burglary, lar *699 ceny, prison breach, and rescue of a felon.”
State v. Anderson 654 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Anderson 654 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Craven 628 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Craven 628 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(holding predicate felony must involve “special danger” to human life); review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Hanson 583 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Hanson 583 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(dismissals of charges for probable cause appealable if the dismissals “effectively prevented further prosecutions and made reissuing the complaints pointless”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Duffy 559 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Duffy 559 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Moe 498 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Moe 498 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Carithers 490 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1992
State v. Carithers 490 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1992
The majority opinion concluded that the crime of the sale of cocaine is not one that involves some special danger to human life because “use of cocaine, even when injected, does not generally cause death.” pet.
State v. Carithers 484 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Carithers 484 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The parties agree, and the trial court found, pet.
State v. Kiminski 474 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Kiminski 474 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Poupard 471 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Poupard 471 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-6 (Minn.App.1988) (error in permitting defense to call victim as recantation witness and ruling victim’s hearsay statements to police inadmissible); -23 (Minn.App.1987) (error in interpreting statutory definition); pet.
State v. Berger 412 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Berger 412 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Appellant also claims the trial court determined lack of probable cause but argues this particular pretrial order is an exception to nonappealability because the dismissal “effectively defeats or prevents successful prosecutive action against [respondent].” pet.
State v. Diedrich 410 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Diedrich 410 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
We have interpreted this rule as allowing appeals from pretrial dismissal orders where they “effectively prevented further prosecutions and made reissuing the complaints pointless.” ( pet.
State v. Hendrickson 395 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hendrickson 395 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Olson 382 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Olson 382 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1986