Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini, 414 N.W.2d 184.

199 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Elena Vladimirovna Tokarev v. Vladimir Efimovich Tokarev Minn. Ct. App. 2017
3 (emphasis added); n.10 (Minn. 9 Husband also cites an unpublished decision to support his argument.
In re the Marriage of: Sonya Sebring Stylos v. Lee Stylos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Sonya Sebring Stylos v. Lee Stylos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 184, 198 (Minn. 1987).
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis 887 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis 887 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2016
Likewise, we assessed the sufficiency of a limited maintenance award based on the expected return from investing a cash settlement in income-producing assets.
In re the Marriage of: Matthew John Miller v. Jody Lynn Bichrt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Matthew John Miller v. Jody Lynn Bichrt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
And the supreme court has noted 4 legislative history that indicates that “temporary maintenance should not be favored over permanent awards.” n.10 (Minn. 1987).
In re the Marriage of: Carol Lee D'Costa v. Joseph Francis D'Costa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Carol Lee D'Costa v. Joseph Francis D'Costa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“‘[A]n increase in the value of nonmarital property attributable to inflation or to market forces or conditions[] retains its nonmarital character.’” ().
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Charles DeBolt Hart v. Jennifer Jayne Hart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. May 16, 1991).
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(remanding for an award of permanent spousal maintenance, based on a non-working spouse’s 30-year absence from the workforce and uncertain ability to become fully employed).
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“If the interest is ‘income’ from the nonmarital asset, it is marital income.”); (stating that cash distributions received during a marriage are typically “considered a return on the investment or income and, therefore .
Braylock v. Jesson 819 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2012
Braylock v. Jesson 819 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2012
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
We also conclude that the district court misapplied the law regarding spousal maintenance based on its reading of Carrick; rev’d on other grounds
RISK EX REL. MILLER v. Stark 787 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
RISK EX REL. MILLER v. Stark 787 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
The present value of the homestead was $108,900, resulting from $41,700 in appreciation during the marriage
Marriage of Maiers v. Maiers 775 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Maiers v. Maiers 775 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
in which the supreme court reversed a district court’s award of temporary maintenance to a woman who had a high-school education and was a homemaker throughout 31 years of marriage.
Lee v. Lee 775 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 2009
Lee v. Lee 775 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 2009
Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club v. City of Shorewood 770 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club v. City of Shorewood 770 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Holman v. All Nation Ins.
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 753 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 2008
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 753 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 2008
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
3b, provided such an increase is the result of passive appreciation, Gottsacker, d at 853 (); review denied (Minn. May 16, 1991).
Marriage of Reed v. Albaaj 723 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Reed v. Albaaj 723 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Zander v. Zander 720 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Zander v. Zander 720 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
[are] income and; therefore, [are] marital property.”) (); cf. Minn.Stat.
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bank of Greenwald v. Herickhoff (stating while “[o]rdinarily” statutes are not applied retroactively, amendments seeking only to clarify “may be applied retroactively” because “the legislature is not changing its mind but is only making clear the legislative intent that was always there”) (citations omitted); (stating “a clarifying act is to be read into statutory law retrospectively”).
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
Youker v. Youker 661 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Youker v. Youker 661 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(holding that an increase in the value of nonmarital property attributable to the efforts of one or both spouses during marriage is marital property); (stating that such efforts include a party’s contribution of funds, labor, or entrepreneurial deci
Marriage of Antone v. Antone 645 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2002
Marriage of Antone v. Antone 645 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2002
Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by