Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security, 386 N.W.2d 702.

274 citing documents.

State v. LORSUNG 658 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Collins 655 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Collins 655 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695 649 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Occhino v. Grover 640 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Occhino v. Grover 640 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge 637 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge 637 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In re A.K. 633 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re AK 633 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re AK 633 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Sec., (citation omitted).
In re A.K. 633 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Sec., (citation omitted).
Burkstrand v. Burkstrand 632 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2001
Burkstrand v. Burkstrand 632 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2001
Wiegel v. City of St. Paul 627 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Wiegel v. City of St. Paul 627 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gerding v. Commissioner of Public Safety 628 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gerding v. Commissioner of Public Safety 628 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the June 9, 2000 Fence Viewing Petition of Bailey 626 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the June 9, 2000 Fence Viewing Petition of Bailey 626 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Boatwright v. Budak 625 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Boatwright v. Budak 625 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Sec., (recognizing where statute is unambiguous, effect must be given to its plain meaning).
Central Specialties, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 622 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Central Specialties, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 622 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Baumann v. Chaska Building Center, Inc. 621 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Baumann v. Chaska Building Center, Inc. 621 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Sec., (stating that legislative history can be considered in interpreting a statute only after the statute is found to be ambiguous).
City of Red Wing v. Ellsworth Community School District 617 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Red Wing v. Ellsworth Community School District 617 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Mullins v. Churchill 616 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Mullins v. Churchill 616 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sec., (citation omitted).
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 615 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2000
Johnson v. Americar Rental Systems 613 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Johnson v. Americar Rental Systems 613 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re Robledo 611 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re Robledo 611 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 611 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 611 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority v. Reiling 610 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority v. Reiling 610 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, Vin 2MEBP95F9CX644211 License No. MN 225 NSG 609 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Vossen v. Parker 609 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of Duluth 609 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, Vin 2MEBP95F9CX644211 License No. MN 225 NSG 609 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sec., (explaining that courts must give effect to the plain meaning of a statute’s unambiguous language).
Vossen v. Parker 609 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of Duluth 609 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sec., (citations omitted); see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (1998) (“When the words of a law in their application to an existing situation are clear and free from all ambiguity, the letter of the law shall not be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing the spirit.”).
State v. Furman 609 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2000