Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., 417 N.W.2d 619.

131 citing documents.

Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources 492 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., (finding as to “reasonableness” necessary).
Application of Jobe 477 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Jones v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 474 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Jones v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 474 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.
Graham v. Special School District No. 1 472 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1991
Graham v. Special School District No. 1 472 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1991
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., -27 (Minn.1988).
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank 471 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1991
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank 471 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1991
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall and Co., (defining burden of proof under three-part analysis of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct.
Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc. 459 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Kolstad v. Fairway Foods, Inc. 457 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Kolstad v. Fairway Foods, Inc. 457 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., -24 (Minn.1988)
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Moorhead State University 455 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Moorhead State University 455 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., Inc., -24 (Minn.1988).
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B. 452 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B. 452 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
The trial court is permitted to exclude from the “lodestar” figure hours that were not “reasonably expended.” Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.
Rutherford v. County of Kandiyohi 449 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Rutherford v. County of Kandiyohi 449 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 256 (1981); see Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., aff'd in part, rev’d in part
Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc. 447 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1989
Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc. 447 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1989
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.
Graffius v. Control Data Corp. 447 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Graffius v. Control Data Corp. 447 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., Inc.
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 433 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 433 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., (citing Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 , 103 S.Ct.
In re Hixson 434 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re Hixson 434 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
As we discussed in Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., aff'd in part, rev’d in part, a respondent prevailing on appeal is entitled to attorney fees.
Ridler v. Olivia Public School System No. 653 432 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ridler v. Olivia Public School System No. 653 432 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See, e.g., Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., Inc.