Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marklund v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 400 N.W.2d 337.

29 citing documents.

John Arthur Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co., (observing that premises hazards resulting in slips and falls in proximity to motor vehicles are not within “the parameters of hazards whose costs should be allocated to the activity of motoring”); see also Christensen v. Gen.
Nancy Bach, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Liberty Mutual argues we should follow the supreme court’s
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin 707 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin 707 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co., a case addressing situs, coverage was denied when the claimant slipped and fell on a patch of ice after refueling his vehicle.
Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. 699 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2005
Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. 699 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2005
In support of this argument, and the court of appeals’ rev. denied (Minn. May 15, 1992).
Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. 683 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. 683 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co., supports the proposition that respondent’s injuries do not arise out of the use of her vehicle.
North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 634 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 634 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., (noting distinction between “use” and “maintenance” of motor vehicle); Midwest Family Mut.
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 617 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Steinfeldt v. AMCO Insurance Co. 592 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Steinfeldt v. AMCO Insurance Co. 592 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 588 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1999
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 588 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1999
Co., (citing the fact that the insured’s acts of maintenance were complete by the time he slipped and fell as one factor weighing against his recovery of no-fault benefits); see also Waldbillig v. State Farm Mut.
Kern v. Auto Owners Insurance Co. 526 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kern v. Auto Owners Insurance Co. 526 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Ins., (quoting Commissioner’s Comments, Unif.Motor Veh.Acc.Reparations Act § 1, 14 U.L.A.
Benike v. Dairyland Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Benike v. Dairyland Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Christensen v. General Accident Insurance 482 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Christensen v. General Accident Insurance 482 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., and Brehm v. Illinois Farmers Ins.
Dohman v. Housely 478 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Dohman v. Housely 478 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Karpe 430 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Karpe 430 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Because the parameters of “maintenance” under this section have not been prescribed, the supreme court has indicated that in “borderline cases” the courts should keep in mind the policy of the “no fault” act that definitions be limited “to activities whose costs should be allocated to motoring as a part of an automobile insurance package.” (quoting Commissioner’s Comments, Unif.
Hanson v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 422 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hanson v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 422 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See, -41 (Minn.1987) (injuries sustained when insured slipped and fell on a gas station’s concrete apron after filling and capping his car’s gas tank had no nexus with the “maintenance” of his vehicle because injuries could have happened anywhere that there existed a premises hazard and presence of car was only inciden
Wiczek Ex Rel. Wiczek v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. 416 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wiczek Ex Rel. Wiczek v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. 416 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
at 56, , 339 n. 5 (Minn.1987).