Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Iverson, 445 N.W.2d 824.

42 citing documents.

In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 667 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2003
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 667 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2003
Fire & and Lanoue v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Cos., to the extent that they were inconsistent with Morrison “as a limited exception to the general rule that legal fees are not recoverable absent statutory authority.” American Standard, d at 927-28 .
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M. 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of Cm 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M. 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
rev’d in part on othef grounds
Matter of Cm 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
rev'd in part on other grounds
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
overruled on other grounds by American Standard Ins.
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(stating that “insurer must defend where any part of the claim is arguably within the scope of policy coverage”).
Kabanuk Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Credit General Insurance Co. 553 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Kabanuk Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Credit General Insurance Co. 553 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
American Standard Insurance Co. v. Le 551 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1996
American Standard Insurance Co. v. Le 551 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1996
for its decision that American Standard was obliged to pay the cost of Le’s defense of the declaratory action.
American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van Le 539 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van Le 539 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
the Minnesota Supreme Court adopted the Morrison rationale to protect insureds from having to pay attorney fees to defend such actions brought against them by their insurers.
Tschimperle v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 529 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Tschimperle v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 529 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Haarstad v. Graff 517 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1994
Haarstad v. Graff 517 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1994
Haarstad relies on Economy Fire & which states: The duty to provide a defense is based on the allegations contained in the plaintiffs complaint.
Pedro Companies v. Sentry Insurance 518 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Pedro Companies v. Sentry Insurance 518 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Employers National Insurance Co. v. Breaux 516 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
CPT Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
CPT Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
An insurer has a duty to defend “where any part of the claim is arguably within the scope of the policy coverage.” Economy Fire &amp
Haarstad v. Graff 506 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Haarstad v. Graff 506 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
ANALYSIS I. Duty to Defend An insurer has a legal duty to defend “where any part of the claim is arguably within the scope of policy coverage.” Economy Fire & (complaint alleged negligence, “which, if proven, would, even under [insurer’s] interpretation of the policy, constitute an ‘occurrence’ and would fall within the scope of [insured’s] policy coverage”).
Seifert v. Regents of University of Minnesota 505 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Seifert v. Regents of University of Minnesota 505 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Economy Fire & Brown v. State Auto.
Spicer, Watson & Carp v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. 502 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Spicer, Watson & Carp v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. 502 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
an insurer provided a full defense to its insured but brought a declaratory judgment action asking the- court to relieve the insurer of its duty to defend due to an “intentional act” exclusion.
Vang v. Vang 490 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Vang v. Vang 490 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
aff'd in part, rev’d in part
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Computer Systems, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Computer Systems, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Rulli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 479 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Rulli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 479 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Economy Fire & Bobich v. Oja, 258 Minn. 287, 293
Brownsdale Cooperative Ass'n v. Home Insurance Co. 473 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Brownsdale Cooperative Ass'n v. Home Insurance Co. 473 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
S.G. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 460 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
S.G. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 460 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Economy Fire & Lanoue v: Fireman’s Fund American Ins.
Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co. 451 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1990