Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thiele v. Stich, 425 N.W.2d 580.
- Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Carlson 476 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Corazalla v. Quie 473 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Corazalla v. Quie
473 N.W.2d 347
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Thus, the moving party “must demonstrate no genuine issue of material fact exists.”
- Acrometal Companies, Inc. v. First American Bank of Brainerd 475 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Acrometal Companies, Inc. v. First American Bank of Brainerd 475 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Crossroads Bank of Georgia v. State Bank of Springfield 474 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Crossroads Bank of Georgia v. State Bank of Springfield
474 N.W.2d 14
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“The party moving for summary judgment * * * must demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact exists.”
- Phillips-Klein Companies v. Tiffany Partnership 474 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Phillips-Klein Companies v. Tiffany Partnership 474 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Menard, Inc. v. King De Son, Co., Ltd. 467 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Menard, Inc. v. King De Son, Co., Ltd. 467 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. Bollmeier 462 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. Bollmeier 462 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Orfei & Sons, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Orfei & Sons, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- ERICKSON BY ERICKSON v. Hammermeister 458 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- ERICKSON BY ERICKSON v. Hammermeister 458 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State Fund Mutual Insurance Co. v. Enebo 458 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State Fund Mutual Insurance Co. v. Enebo 458 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Retrum 456 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Retrum 456 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Interpace Corp. 454 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Interpace Corp. 454 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Flooring Removal, Inc. v. Ryerson 447 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1989
- Flooring Removal, Inc. v. Ryerson 447 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1989
- McElwain v. Van Beek 447 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
McElwain v. Van Beek
447 N.W.2d 442
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
“A reviewing court must generally consider ‘only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.’ ” (quoting Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., ).
- Royal Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty Insurance Co. 444 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Royal Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty Insurance Co.
444 N.W.2d 846
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.”
- Gorath v. Rockwell International, Inc. 441 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Gorath v. Rockwell International, Inc.
441 N.W.2d 128
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324, 106 S.Ct.
- Clapper v. Budget Oil Co. 437 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Clapper v. Budget Oil Co.
437 N.W.2d 722
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Biba Information Processing Services, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Biba Information Processing Services, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc. 433 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc. 433 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Sabes & Richman, Inc. v. Muenzer 431 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Sabes & Richman, Inc. v. Muenzer
431 N.W.2d 916
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
S & R rev’d contending that the supreme court reversed on the ground that the issue of when the malpractice action accrued was not raised in the trial court and was not preserved for appeal.
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Republic Underwriters Insurance Co.
429 N.W.2d 695
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Urban v. Continental Convention & Show Management, Inc., 244 Minn. 44, 47 , (cannot raise new theory of recovery on appeal).