Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubred v. Control Data Corp., 442 N.W.2d 308.

311 citing documents.

Benjamin Menier, a minor, by and through Robin Menier as parent and natural guardian, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
An insured asserting that the doctrine should supersede the actual policy language must point to facts or circumstances that, “despite the clear import of the exclusion, would justify a reasonable expectation of coverage.” d 308, 311-12 (Minn. 1989).
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
K & R Landholdings, LLC, d/b/a High Banks Resort, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Hubred v. Control Data Corp.
Bernadette L. Russell, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hubred v. Control Data Corp.
The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kastning v. State Farm Insurance Companies 821 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Kastning v. State Farm Insurance Companies 821 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“The doctrine does not remove from the insured the responsibility to read the policy but at the same time does not hold the insured to an unreasonable level of understanding of the policy.”
In re the Estate of Perrin 796 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Estate of Perrin 796 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 779 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 779 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re the Estate of Grote 766 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Estate of Grote 766 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
In Hubred v. Control Data Corp., we construed a provision in an insurance policy excluding medical expenses due to injury “incurred during employment for wages or profit.”
Frey v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 743 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Frey v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 743 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 734 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 734 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Silver v. Ridgeway 733 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Silver v. Ridgeway 733 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Collier 711 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Collier 711 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Northfield Care Center, Inc. v. Anderson 707 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Northfield Care Center, Inc. v. Anderson 707 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Kramer v. Commissioner of Public Safety 706 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Kramer v. Commissioner of Public Safety 706 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty 695 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty 695 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
1 Hubred v. *404 Control Data Corp.
In Re the Estate of Bonde 694 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Estate of Bonde 694 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician 674 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician 674 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(stating that the application of the law to uncontested facts is a matter for de novo review).
General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Concepts 667 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Concepts 667 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(courts must construe ambiguous language in an insurance policy against the insurer and in favor of the insured).
TIG Insurance Co. v. Anderson 663 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
TIG Insurance Co. v. Anderson 663 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Estate of Riggle 654 N.W.2d 710 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Estate of Riggle 654 N.W.2d 710 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State Auto Insurance Co. v. Knuttila 645 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State Auto Insurance Co. v. Knuttila 645 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of St. Paul v. Lambrecht 645 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2002