DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 444 N.W.2d 824.

117 citing documents.

  • State v. Petrick 527 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1995
    In reaching this decision
  • State v. Fakler 503 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Fakler 503 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1993
    1581, 1586-87 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989); -66 (Minn.1987).
  • In Re the Welfare of E.D.J. 502 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1993
  • In Re the Welfare of E.D.J. 502 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1993
    2130 , 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993); 2 (upholding stop of a motorist on the basis of deliberately evasive conduct by the motorist that caused the trooper to reasonably suspect motorist of wrongdoing).
  • State v. Saffeels 484 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Saffeels 484 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    -27 (Minn.1989) (rejecting per se rule than an evasive act does not justify an investigative stop).
  • State v. Dickerson 481 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Dickerson 481 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1992
  • Cummins v. Klenk 474 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • Cummins v. Klenk 474 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    In this case, which allows a police officer to make a brief limited investigative stop if the officer has a particular and objective basis for suspecting the person stopped of criminal activity.
  • State v. Dickerson 469 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Dickerson 469 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    A trained police officer is entitled to draw inferences on the basis of “all of the circumstances * * * inferences and deductions that might well elude an untrained person.” (quoting Cortez, 449 U.S. at 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Day 461 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Day 461 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    (trooper made eye contact with driver causing him to suspect driver was later trying to evade him).
  • City of St. Paul v. Uber 450 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • City of St. Paul v. Uber 450 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    The officer must have a “particular and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” 3 (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 , 101 S.Ct.