Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Smith, 448 N.W.2d 550.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(explaining that a district court’s credibility determination is reviewed for clear error), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“Determinations of credibility of witnesses at the omnibus hearing are left to the trial court, and those determinations will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.”), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Determinations of credibility of witnesses at the omnibus hearing are left to the [district] court, and those determinations will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.” rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Demarcius Maurice Payton Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Demarcius Maurice Payton Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1 - 56 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Carl Douglas Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Carl Douglas Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Determinations of credibility of witnesses at the omnibus hearing are left to the [district] court, and those determinations will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.” rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Earl Alfonso Culver Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Earl Alfonso Culver Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court is given “great deference” in determining whether an affidavit establishes probable cause, “but this deference is not boundless.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In addition, “[d]eterminations of credibility of witnesses at the omnibus hearing are left to the trial court, and those determinations will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.” (), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Scott Andrew Syversrud Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott Andrew Syversrud Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Determinations of credibility of witnesses at the omnibus hearing are left to the trial court, and those determinations will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
Troy K. Scheffler v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Troy K. Scheffler v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 550, 555 (Minn. App. 1989), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. George Edward Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. George Edward Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In addition, “determinations of credibility of witnesses at the omnibus hearing are left to the [district] court, and those determinations will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.” (), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Carlester Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Carlester Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
555 (Minn. App. 1989), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. McGrath 706 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. McGrath 706 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Doyle, d at 250 ; -56 (Minn.App.1989) (holding that reckless misrepresentation is “material” if there is not probable cause to issue search warrant when misrepresentation is set aside), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Smith 655 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Smith 655 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Fields 529 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Fields 529 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Dunkel 466 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Dunkel 466 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“[A] jury instruction on burden of proof concerns a fundamental principle of law, and may be raised on appeal regardless of whether an objection was made at trial.” (), pet.