Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Naylor, 474 N.W.2d 314.
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Arnold Westrom 6 N.W.3d 145 Minn. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Jerry Arnold Westrom
6 N.W.3d 145
Minn. 2024
d 314, 321 (Minn. 1991).
- State v. DeRosier 719 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2006
- State v. DeRosier 719 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2006
- State v. Litzau 650 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2002
-
State v. Litzau
650 N.W.2d 177
Minn. 2002
“Evidentiary errors warrant reversal if ‘there is any reasonable doubt the result would have been different had the evidence not been admitted.’ ” ().
- State v. Williams 586 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1998
- State v. Williams 586 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1998
- State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
- State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
- State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
- State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
- State v. Folkers 562 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Folkers 562 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Harris 560 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1997
- State v. Harris 560 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1997
- State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Willis
559 N.W.2d 693
Minn. 1997
Reversal is warranted when “there is any reasonable doubt the result would have been different had the evidence not been admitted.” (citations omitted).
- State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Grayson 546 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1996
-
State v. Grayson
546 N.W.2d 731
Minn. 1996
Evidentia-ry errors warrant reversal if “there is any reasonable doubt the result would have been different had the evidence not been admitted.”
- State v. Klosterboer 529 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Klosterboer 529 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Dillon 529 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Dillon 529 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Thompson 520 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
State v. Thompson
520 N.W.2d 468
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(reversal warranted only if court has reasonable belief that erroneously admitted evidence affected verdict).
- State v. Starkey 516 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1994
-
State v. Starkey
516 N.W.2d 918
Minn. 1994
the defendant, a member of a satanic cult, was convicted of the ritualistic slaying of a fellow cult member.
- State v. Hawkins 511 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1994
- State v. McKenzie 511 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1994
- State v. McKenzie 511 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1994
- State v. Hawkins 511 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1994
- State v. Starkey 507 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State v. Starkey
507 N.W.2d 8
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Hogan, 297 Minn. 430, 433 , -68 (1973).
- State v. Berry 484 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1992
- State v. Berry 484 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1992
- State v. Gibson 478 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
- State v. Gibson 478 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991