Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff's Department, 497 N.W.2d 260.

42 citing documents.

A25-1221 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
at 915 (quoting Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t, ).
A21-1527 A21-1528 A21-1530 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Sheriff’ s Dep’t , (declining to find a private cause of action within Minnesota’s Crime Victims Reparations Act).
Tyler Halva, Minn. 2021
Sheriff’s Dep ’t, (declining to find a private cause of action within Minnesota’s Crime Victims Reparations Act).
A18-0707 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sheriff’s Dep’t , (concluding that principles of judicial restraint preclude judicial creation of additional causes of action outside those evident in a statute’s express or implied terms).
Barry McReynolds, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sheriff’s Dep’t, d 260, 262 (Minn.1993) (concluding that principles of judicial restraint preclude judicial creation of additional causes of action outside those evident in a statute’s express or implied terms).
Robert P. Ivers, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Sheriff’s Dep’t, (holding that the Crime Victims Reparations Act does not, either expressly or impliedly, provide a cause of action against law enforcement agencies that fail to inform crime victims of their rights to seek reparations); n.4 (Minn. 1990) (concluding that a statute cri
Lickteig v. Kolar 782 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2010
Lickteig v. Kolar 782 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2010
Generally, “[a] statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action unless the language of the statute is explicit or it can be determined by clear implication.” ( , 47 n. 4 (Minn.1990)); see also Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t, (concluding that principles of judicial restraint preclude judicial creation of additional causes of action outside those evident in a statute’s express or implied terms).
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co. 781 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 2010
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co. 781 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 2010
(“A statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action unless the language of the statute is explicit or it can be determined by clear implication.” (citing Larson v. Dunn, 460'N.W.2d 39, 47 n. 4 (Minn.1990))); see also Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t, (concluding that principles of judicial restraint preclude courts’ ability to create additional causes of action outside those evident by a statute’s express or implied terms).
Losen v. Allina Health System 767 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Losen v. Allina Health System 767 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Appellants assert that Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriffs Dep’t, support their argument.
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
“Principles of judicial restraint preclude us from creating a new statutory cause of action that does not exist at common law where the legislature has not either by the statute’s express terms or by implication provided for civil tort liability.” Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t, (holding that the Crime Victims Reparations Act does not create a private cause of action against law enforcement agencies that fail to inform crime victims of their right to seek reparations).
Radke v. County of Freeborn 676 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Radke v. County of Freeborn 676 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(citing Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff's Dep’t., ).
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
liability.” Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t
Kuelbs v. Williams 609 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Kuelbs v. Williams 609 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t
Summers v. R & D AGENCY, INC. 593 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Summers v. R & D AGENCY, INC. 593 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(citing Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t, ).
Olson v. Moorhead Country Club 568 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Olson v. Moorhead Country Club 568 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriffs Dep’t, the sheriffs department breached its statutory duty to inform the parents of a sexual abuse victim of their rights under the CVRA.
Haage v. Steies 555 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Haage v. Steies 555 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff's Dep’t
Hoppe Ex Rel. Dykema v. Kandiyohi County 543 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1996
Hoppe Ex Rel. Dykema v. Kandiyohi County 543 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1996
We, accordingly, decline to impose potential civil liability for the alleged negligence here, relying upon our analysis in Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t, (where there was no common law cause of action for failure to inform individuals of potential rights of recovery under the Crime Victims Reparations Act, Minn.Stat.
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 533 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1995
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 533 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1995
3 Recently we held that “[p]rinciples of judicial restraint preclude us from creating a new statutory cause of action that does not exist at common law where the legislature has not either by the statute’s express terms or by implication provided for civil tort liability.”
Larsen v. Wright County Human Service Agency-Day Care Division 526 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Larsen v. Wright County Human Service Agency-Day Care Division 526 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
This court considered a similar claim in Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff's Dep’t, aff'd
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
“A statute eannot create a private cause of action that the legislature has not clearly expressed or implied.” (citing Brmgger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t, ); see also Morris v. American Fam.
Iacona v. Schrupp 509 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Iacona v. Schrupp 509 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff’s Dep’t
Valtakis v. Putnam 504 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Valtakis v. Putnam 504 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriffs Dep’t