Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Claflin v. Commercial State Bank of Two Harbors, 487 N.W.2d 242.
- ROA Rochester v. City of Byron Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
ROA Rochester v. City of Byron
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State Bank of Two Harbors, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
- Dale LeRoy Tiede v. County of Le Sueur, Daniel J. Sullivan, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Dale LeRoy Tiede v. County of Le Sueur, Daniel J. Sullivan, ...
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State Bank of Two Harbors, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
-
County of Pope, Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Moreover, “[a]ctual possession of real property is notice to all the world of the title and rights of the person so in possession and also of all facts connected therewith which reasonable inquiry would have developed.” , review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert P. Carlson, North Shore Federal Credit Union, Below. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert P. Carlson, North Shore Federal Credit Union, Below.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 put one on further inquiry” regarding the existence of an easement “is not a bona fide purchaser entitled to the protection of the recording act.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Graves v. Wayman 816 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Graves v. Wayman
816 N.W.2d 655
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
18, 2003); (“In Minnesota, clear, actual, exclusive possession of the granted premises by the grant- or, even after delivery and recording of the deed, is notice against purchasers and mortgagees of the grantor’s possible inter *667 est in the property.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Elfelt 756 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Elfelt
756 N.W.2d 501
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Equally important, section 507.34 also allows purchasers to rely on the record, Miller, d at 369 ; review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC
733 N.W.2d 480
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
As a result of this obligation, the purchaser is held to have knowledge of all the “rights of the [possessor] and also of all facts connected therewith which reasonable inquiry would have developed.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
- American States Insurance Co. v. Ankrum 651 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
American States Insurance Co. v. Ankrum
651 N.W.2d 513
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(JNOV); (directed verdict), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Overocker v. Solie 597 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Overocker v. Solie
597 N.W.2d 579
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
561 N.W.2d 530
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc.
560 N.W.2d 100
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In reviewing the directed verdict, we “must accept as true the evidence favorable to the adverse party and all reasonable inferences which can be drawn from that evidence.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Bills v. Willow Run I Apartments 534 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Bills v. Willow Run I Apartments 534 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- United Products Corp. v. Atlas Auto Parts 529 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- United Products Corp. v. Atlas Auto Parts 529 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- K.L. v. Riverside Medical Center 524 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- K.L. v. Riverside Medical Center 524 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Gustafson v. Chestnut 515 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Gustafson v. Chestnut 515 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1994