Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc., 505 N.W.2d 54.

51 citing documents.

Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc.
Miller v. Soo Line R.R. Co. 925 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Miller v. Soo Line R.R. Co. 925 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc. , , 132 (Minn. App. 1992), aff'd in part, rev'd in part
Cnty. of Hennepin v. Bhakta 922 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2019
Cnty. of Hennepin v. Bhakta 922 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2019
In reaching this conclusion the court of appeals relied on *197 Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. , which involved an appeal of a pretrial order denying a request for a jury, rather than a bench, trial.
Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sauter, d at 201-02; Heise v. J.R. Clark Co., 245 Minn. 179, 191, (citing cases); cf. Alpha Real Estate Co. v. Delta Dental 4 Plan, Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation 852 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2014
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation 852 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2014
In Abraham , we looked to Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc., to identify the "thread run[ning] through [the court’s] line of decisions.” Abra *675 ham, d at 349 .
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
See Abraham, d at 353 ; 61-62 (Minn.1993).
Moen v. Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc. 818 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Moen v. Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc. 818 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
at 310 ( and Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc., ).
Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Bjelland 690 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Bjelland 690 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc., the supreme court stated that, because the employer steps into the shoes of the employee, the employer “should be limited to recovery of common law damages.” In its summary judgment memorandum, the district court noted that “the amendment may overrule part of the holding in Tyroll ...."
In Re Approval of Settlement & Distribution of Wrongful Death Proceeds for the Next of Kin of Markuson 685 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Approval of Settlement & Distribution of Wrongful Death Proceeds for the Next of Kin of Markuson 685 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc.
Gray v. Badger Mining Corp. 676 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 2004
Gray v. Badger Mining Corp. 676 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 2004
Co., overruled on other grounds by Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc.
Gray v. Badger Mining Corp. 664 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Gray v. Badger Mining Corp. 664 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., review denied (Minn. June 29, 1998), overruled on other grounds by Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc.
Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota 664 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2003
Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota 664 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2003
But, in light of this court’s reasoning in Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc., the court of appeals concluded that the question of law exception is not a legitimate exception and refused to apply it to the present case.
Zaluckyj v. Rice Creek Watershed District 639 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Zaluckyj v. Rice Creek Watershed District 639 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc.
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
527, 528 (1915) (holding that in actions originally actions at law either party may demand jury trial, but in equitable actions there is no right to jury trial); see also Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc.
Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co. 634 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2001
Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co. 634 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2001
Con-wed's intent is to either settle or try its claim according to Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc., which allegedly supports Conwed’s intent to leave the employees to bring their own claims.
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Finally, in Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc., -57 (Minn.1993), the supreme court considered the right of jury trial in a subrogation action brought by a workers’ compensation insurer after the injured employee entered a Naig settlement.
Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc. 613 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc. 613 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See, e.g., Henning, d at 550 ; Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc., Locher, d at 275 .
Denman v. Gans 607 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Denman v. Gans 607 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc.
Schlichte v. Kielan 599 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Cole v. Star Tribune 581 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Cole v. Star Tribune 581 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Cf. Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc., (noting, “[w]ith a little ingenuity, most questions can be converted into so-called ‘questions of law’”).
Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC. 580 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC. 580 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The supreme court continued its discussion of this issue in Tyroll v. Private Label Chems., Inc.
Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. County of Hennepin 576 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1998
Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. County of Hennepin 576 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1998
1 Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc., ().
City of Glendale v. Aldabbagh 928 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hagel v. Schoenbauer 532 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hagel v. Schoenbauer 532 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Overruled Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Mueller v. Theis 512 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Mueller v. Theis 512 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc., (workers’ compensation); (same); Liberty Mutual Ins.
Krueger v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 510 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1993