Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baber v. Dill, 531 N.W.2d 493.

63 citing documents.

Rinn v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society 611 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
On review, an appellate court “must independently determine whether an issue of fact exists when the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
Sutherland v. Barton 570 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1997
Sutherland v. Barton 570 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1997
Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare Services 568 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare Services 568 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Boone v. Martinez 567 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1997
Boone v. Martinez 567 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1997
Sutherland v. Barton 560 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Sutherland v. Barton 560 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Moreover, a possessor of land is hable for known and- obvious dangers if “the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness.” -96 (Minn.1995) (applying and quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343A (1965)).
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 533 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1995
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 533 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1995