Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Green, 541 N.W.2d 584.

56 citing documents.

  • State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    rious than that typically involved in the commission of the crime in question” (emphasis added) (quotations omitted)); (stating court “should consider whether the defendant’s conduct was significantly more or less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the crime in question” (emphasis added) (quotation omitted)); (stating district court must look to see “whether a defendant’s conduct was significantly more or less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the c
  • State v. Voorhees 596 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1999
    We will reverse only if the misconduct is “so serious and prejudicial that a defendant’s right to a fair trial is denied.”
  • State v. Williams 586 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Folkers 581 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1998
    See Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.D.2.b(2); -90 (Minn.1996) (particular cruelty as the sole basis used in justifying upward departure).
  • State v. Ives 568 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997