Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co., 552 N.W.2d 723.

30 citing documents.

Douglas Kemp, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Latterell v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. 801 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2011
Latterell v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. 801 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2011
Co., (invalidating a policy exclusion denying UIM benefits unless the insured first obtained written consent to sue a third party); Roering v. Grinnell Mitt.
George v. Evenson 754 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2008
George v. Evenson 754 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2008
We are called upon to decide whether the unorthodox arbitration proceeding in this motor vehicle accident dispute was the functional equivalent of (1) a tort action pursued to a conclusion in a district court action, in which case the underinsurer was entitled to notice pursuant to Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co., or (2) an effort to arrive at a settlement agreement between the injured claimant and the tort- *337 feasors, (Minn.1983
Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co., stating that re *915 spondent would be responsible for damages in its capacity as appellant’s UIM carrier and advising that “there is a binding arbitration in front of a single arbitrator scheduled for September 16, 2003.” The letter provided no specific information about the location of the arbitration
Murray v. Puls 690 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Murray v. Puls 690 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Gerdesmeier v. Sutherland 690 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2004
Gerdesmeier v. Sutherland 690 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2004
As to that conflict, the Gerdesmeiers argue that this case is controlled by Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Co., (underinsured motorists); Employers Mut.
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., (underinsured motorists); Employer’s Mut.
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Nash 651 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Distinguished Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Nash 651 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co. 627 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 2001
Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co. 627 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 2001
Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., which held that a consent to sue clause in an underinsured motorist policy violated the no-fault act.
American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl 598 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Moundson v. Bitzan 588 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Moundson v. Bitzan 588 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Butzer v. Allstate Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Butzer v. Allstate Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Christensen v. Eggen 562 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Christensen v. Eggen 562 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., (finding consent-to-sue clause that released insurer from liability for judgment absent insurer’s written consent was contrary to purposes of no-fault automobile insurance act and void); -63 (Minn.App.1996) (refusing to enforce newspaper’s exculpatory agreement
Washington v. Milbank Insurance Co. 562 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1997
Washington v. Milbank Insurance Co. 562 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1997
Co., (holding that a clause requiring a UIM claimant to obtain consent to sue from the underinsurer is viola-tive of public policy); Employers Mut.