Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Grecinger, 569 N.W.2d 189.
- State v. Vance 685 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Plantin 682 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
State v. Plantin
682 N.W.2d 653
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“The admission of expert testimony is within the broad discretion accorded a trial court, and rulings regarding materiality, foundation, remoteness, relevancy, or the cumulative nature of the evidence may be reversed only if the trial court clearly abused its discretion.” (quotation and citation omitted); (holding reversal requires “apparent error”).
- State v. DeShay 669 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2003
- State v. Lopez-Rios 669 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 2003
-
State v. Lopez-Rios
669 N.W.2d 603
Minn. 2003
702 is “whether the testimony will assist the jury in resolving factual questions presented.”
- Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, Vin: 1JCMT7840HTI07485 650 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 2002
- Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, Vin: 1JCMT7840HTI07485 650 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 2002
- In Re Olson 648 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2002
- In Re Olson 648 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2002
- State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Vue 606 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Vue
606 N.W.2d 719
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
This is necessary to guard against the expert’s “potential to influence a jury unduly” with his court-recognized “special knowledge” and to “ensure that the defendant’s presumption of innocence does not get lost in the flurry of expert testimony.”
- State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Ritt
599 N.W.2d 802
Minn. 1999
727 , ); -97 (Minn.1997); Id.
- State v. Nystrom 596 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Nystrom
596 N.W.2d 256
Minn. 1999
Courts have traditional *260 ly proceeded with great caution when admitting testimony of expert witnesses, especially in criminal cases, because “[a]n expert with special knowledge has the potential to influence a jury unduly.”
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- McKenzie v. State 583 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1998
- McKenzie v. State 583 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1998
- Dunn v. State 578 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1998
- Dunn v. State 578 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1998