Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin, 561 N.W.2d 513.
- Douglas v. Stillwater Area Public Schools 899 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Douglas v. Stillwater Area Public Schools
899 N.W.2d 546
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin, -17 (Minn. 1997) (declining “to read into [a] statute a provision the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks” (quotation omitted)).
- In the Matter of Temphy Thompson�s Verified Application for Compensation from the Contractor Recovery Fund. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
In the Matter of Temphy Thompson�s Verified Application for Compensation from the Contractor Recovery Fund.
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- State v. Mayl 836 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
State v. Mayl
836 N.W.2d 368
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
of Hennepin, -17 (Minn.1997) (stating that an appellate court will decline to read into a statute “a provision the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks” (quotation omitted)).
- In re the Guardianship of Tschumy 834 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
In re the Guardianship of Tschumy
834 N.W.2d 764
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
of Hennepin, -17 (Minn.1997) (stating that an appellate court will decline to read into a statute “a provision the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks”) (quotation omitted).
- Christianson v. Henke 831 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2013
- Christianson v. Henke 831 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2013
- Washek v. New Dimensions Home Health 828 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2013
- Washek v. New Dimensions Home Health 828 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2013
- Northern Realty Ventures, LLC v. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 748 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Northern Realty Ventures, LLC v. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
748 N.W.2d 296
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- State v. Jordan 742 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2007
- Reiter v. Kiffmeyer 721 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 2006
-
Reiter v. Kiffmeyer
721 N.W.2d 908
Minn. 2006
Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin, -17 (Minn.1997).
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater
702 N.W.2d 768
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin, Kloss v. E & H Earthmovers
- Regner v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 652 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Regner v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
652 N.W.2d 557
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- Kobluk v. University of Minnesota 613 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Kobluk v. University of Minnesota
613 N.W.2d 425
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- In re the Northern State Power Co. for Approval of its 1998 Resource Plan 604 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
In re the Northern State Power Co. for Approval of its 1998 Resource Plan
604 N.W.2d 386
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
“Questions of statutory construction are questions of law and are fully reviewable by an appellate court.” Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin, (citation omitted).
- Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc. v. Manheim Services Corp. 599 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc. v. Manheim Services Corp.
599 N.W.2d 179
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
“Questions of statutory construction are questions of law and are fully renewable by an appellate court.” Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin, (citation omitted).
- Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge 598 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge
598 N.W.2d 713
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- Benda v. Girard 592 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 1999
-
Benda v. Girard
592 N.W.2d 452
Minn. 1999
* * * The application of law to stipulated facts is also a question of law, and thus fully reviewable by this court.” Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin, (citations omitted).
- State v. Northway 588 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Northway
588 N.W.2d 180
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- In Re Conservatorship of Nelsen 587 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
In Re Conservatorship of Nelsen
587 N.W.2d 649
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Schools 587 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Schools
587 N.W.2d 311
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Questions of statutory construction are questions of law and are fully reviewable by an appellate court.” Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- Benda v. Girard 585 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Benda v. Girard
585 N.W.2d 422
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- Bersch v. Rgnonti & Associates, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Bersch v. Rgnonti & Associates, Inc.
584 N.W.2d 783
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin
- State v. Hanson 583 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Hanson
583 N.W.2d 4
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Further, a court may not read into a statute a provision that the legislature “purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks.” Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin, -17 (Minn.1997) (quoting Wallace v. Commissioner of Taxation, 289 Minn. 220, 230 , ).
- Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks 580 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks
580 N.W.2d 46
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Comm’n v. County of Hennepin