Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ward, 580 N.W.2d 67.

92 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
One factor in whether there is a sufficient temporal nexus is whether there is “an indication of ongoing criminal activity.”
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Keith Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Keith Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Where a probable cause determination is based on an informant’s tip, the informant’s veracity and the basis of his or her knowledge are considerations under the totality test.” 6
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This court has set forth six factors for evaluating “the reliability of an informant who is confidential but not anonymous to police.”
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gene Charles Walters, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gene Charles Walters, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But our deference to issuing judges is not “unlimited.”
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Seivers cites State v. Ward, which describes “six considerations bearing on the reliability of an informant who is confidential but not anonymous to police.”
State of Minnesota v. Torrence Cortez Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Torrence Cortez Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Larry Jermaine McCool Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Larry Jermaine McCool Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that an “informant’s reliability may be established by sufficient police corroboration of the information supplied, and corroboration of even minor details can ‘lend credence’ to the informant’s information where the police know the identity of the informant”).
State of Minnesota v. Cooper Allen Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Cooper Allen Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate courts “presume that tips from private citizen informants are reliable.” see also 6 (“A first-time citizen informant who has not been involved in the criminal underworld is presumed to be reliable.
State of Minnesota v. Zephaniah James Skarja Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Zephaniah James Skarja Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But our “determination is limited to the information contained in the affidavit offered in support of the warrant application.”
Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc. 819 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc. 819 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(recognizing that the court of appeals cannot “overturn established supreme court precedent”).
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
As an error-correcting court, this court is “not in [a] position to overturn established supreme court precedent.” (referring to this court’s limitations as an intermediate appellate court); (noting this court’s role as “an error-correcting court”).
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 779 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 779 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(stating that this court, as an intermediate appellate court, is “not in [a] position to overturn established supreme court precedent”).
State v. Ross 676 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Ross 676 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
State v. Sletten 664 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Sletten 664 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Hochstein 623 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Hochstein 623 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(finding that reliability may be established by corroboration of “even minor details” that lend credence to the supplied information) (citation omitted).
Garza v. State 619 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Rochefort 619 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Garza v. State 619 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(review of magistrate’s probable cause detérmination is limited to information contained in affidavit supporting warrant application).
State v. Rochefort 619 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(information provided by informant can support finding of probable cause if informant is first-time citizen informant whose credibility is presumed or informant whose information has previously proved reliable).
State v. Demry 605 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Demry 605 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
appellant claims that the record contains no evidence to demonstrate that the informant was reliable.