Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sletten v. Ramsey County, 675 N.W.2d 291.

62 citing documents.

J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v. 287 Intermediate District 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(official immunity); , 43-44 n. 1, 45 (Minn.1996) (official and *901 statutory immunity; also referred to as “discretionary immunity”).
In Re Stadsvold 754 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2008
In Re Stadsvold 754 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2008
("Issues raised for the first time on appeal are not to be considered.").
Thompson v. City of Minneapolis 707 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2006
Thompson v. City of Minneapolis 707 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2006
While we recognize that official immunity is intended to provide “immunity from suit, not just from liability,” when' predicate facts are in dispute, we cannot determine whether official immunity applies until the factual disputes are resolved.
Brown v. City of Bloomington 706 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Brown v. City of Bloomington 706 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Hyatt v. Anoka Police Department 700 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Hyatt v. Anoka Police Department 700 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“Official immunity is a common law doctrine that protects government officials from suit for discretionary actions taken by them in the course of their official duties.”
Fedke v. City of Chaska 685 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Fedke v. City of Chaska 685 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-01 (Minn.2004) (stating that although the state official is not named in the suit, the nature of the official’s conduct determines the applicability of vicarious official immunity).
Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 678 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 2004