Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, 633 N.W.2d 557.

67 citing documents.

Lennis Bentrud, Relator v. Robin Drug Corp., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Substantial evidence “is: (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; and (5) evidence considered in its entirety.” CUP Foods, review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re Enlargement of the Valley Branch Watershed District 781 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Enlargement of the Valley Branch Watershed District 781 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Comrn’n, (stating burden of proof); CUP Foods, (stating presumption), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
CUP Foods, review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000 769 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000 769 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
CUP Foods, review denied (Minn. Nov.
Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of Education 767 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of Education 767 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Substantial evidence is “(1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; and (5) evidence considered in its entirety.” CUP Foods, review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
CUP Foods, review denied (Minn. Nov.
Staeheli v. City of St. Paul 732 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Staeheli v. City of St. Paul 732 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Substantial evidence is: “(1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; and (5) evidence considered in its entirety.” CUP Foods, Inc., v. City of Minneapolis, review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
CUP Foods, review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc. 642 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc. 642 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
14, 1995); see also CUP Foods, -63 (Minn.App.2001), review denied (Minn. Nov.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by