Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Farmers Home Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lill, 332 N.W.2d 635.

39 citing documents.

Depositors Ins. Co. v. Dollansky 919 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 2018
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
(citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. 731 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. 731 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(quoting Canadian Universal Ins.
Minnesota Property Insurance v. Slater 673 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Minnesota Property Insurance v. Slater 673 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell 593 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell 593 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Nygaard v. State Farm Insurance Co. 591 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Nygaard v. State Farm Insurance Co. 591 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hanson Ex Rel. DeMoss 588 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hanson Ex Rel. DeMoss 588 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(insurance policy interpreted according to its plain, ordinary meaning and what a reasonable person would have thought it meant).
Steele v. Great West Casualty Co. 540 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Steele v. Great West Casualty Co. 540 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(en banc) (citing Nordby v. Atlantic Mut.
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(policy language is ambiguous if subject to more than one reasonable interpretation).
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Johannessen 516 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Johannessen 516 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
v. Lill, -38 (Minn.1983).
Neuman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 492 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1992
Neuman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 492 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1992
(ambiguities are to be construed against the drafter of the insurance policy).
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Retail Systems, Inc. v. CNA Insurance Companies 469 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Retail Systems, Inc. v. CNA Insurance Companies 469 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Mikulay v. Home Indemnity Co. 449 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Mikulay v. Home Indemnity Co. 449 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co. 430 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co. 430 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bloomquist v. NWNL General Insurance Co. 421 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bloomquist v. NWNL General Insurance Co. 421 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Amatuzio v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 409 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Amatuzio v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 409 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(one of the fundamentals of insurance law is that ambiguous language in an insurance policy is to be construed in favor of the insured); (a competing reasonable interpretation of the policy gives rise to an ambiguity and the insurer’s reading must give way to the insured’s); Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.
Ross v. City of Minneapolis 408 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ross v. City of Minneapolis 408 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. 363 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. 363 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 345 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1984
Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 345 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1984
LeRoux v. Edmundson, 276 Minn. 120, 123