Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite White v. Metropolitan Medical Center, 332 N.W.2d 25.

296 citing documents.

Jeane Thorne Temporary Service, Inc. v. Elliott 351 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Jeane Thorne Temporary Service, Inc. v. Elliott 351 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see also Group Health Plan, d at 296 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
McDonnell v. Anytime Temporaries 349 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
McDonnell v. Anytime Temporaries 349 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hines v. Sheraton Ritz Hotel 349 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hines v. Sheraton Ritz Hotel 349 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Smith v. American Indian Chem.
Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Benson v. Iowa Beef Processors 348 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hirt v. Lakeland Bakeries 348 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Benson v. Iowa Beef Processors 348 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Looking at the findings in the light most favorable to the commissioner’s representative’s decision, we have an employee who was filling in at a job not regularly his own.
Hirt v. Lakeland Bakeries 348 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline 348 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline 348 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citing Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., ); see also Group Health Plan
Flannigan v. Meadow Lane Health Care Center 347 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Flannigan v. Meadow Lane Health Care Center 347 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mastley v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mastley v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., Group Health Plan
Dawson v. Northland Beverages, Inc. 347 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dawson v. Northland Beverages, Inc. 347 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., Group Health Plan
Preiss v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Preiss v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Schmidt v. City of Duluth 346 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. City of Duluth 346 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the Minnesota Supreme Court further outlined the parameters of appellate review in unemployment compensation eases and stated: The narrow standard of review requires that findings be reviewed in the light most favorable to the decision, and if there is evidence reasonably tending to sustain them, they wil
Blau v. Masters Restaurant Associates, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Blau v. Masters Restaurant Associates, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Evenson v. Omnetic's 344 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Evenson v. Omnetic's 344 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., King v. Little Italy, supra.
Flahave v. Lang Meat Packing 343 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hoemberg v. Watco Publishers, Inc. 343 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Flahave v. Lang Meat Packing 343 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hoemberg v. Watco Publishers, Inc. 343 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Although our scope of review is limited, upon review, we find there is no evidence to sustain this holding because the employees did not know the handbook provisions on discipline would not be followed.
Hanka v. Hardware 343 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion Project 343 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion Project 343 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hanka v. Hardware 343 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Callander v. Starkman Drug, Inc. 341 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Callander v. Starkman Drug, Inc. 341 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
On judicial review, the findings are to “be reviewed in the light most favorable to the decision, and if there is evidence reasonably tending to sustain them, they will not be disturbed.” see Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez 341 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez 341 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
see Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Ramirez v. Metro Waste Control Commission 340 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Ramirez v. Metro Waste Control Commission 340 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.