Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Rutten v. Rutten, 347 N.W.2d 47.

510 citing documents.

Marriage of Burton v. Burton 365 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Burton v. Burton 365 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom 359 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom 359 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
d *637 754, 758 (Minn.1984) (the trial court’s decision must be affirmed if it has an acceptable basis in fact and principle).
Wiltsey v. Wiltsey 357 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Foster v. Foster 358 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Foster v. Foster 358 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wiltsey v. Wiltsey 357 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(the trial court’s decision must be affirmed if it has an acceptable basis in fact and principle).
Marriage of Wilson v. Wilson 348 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Wilson v. Wilson 348 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“There must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on the record before this Court will find that the trial court abused its discretion.” at 50 slip op.