Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Flahave v. Lang Meat Packing, 343 N.W.2d 683.

25 citing documents.

Emily C. Dzurak, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Id.; (holding that multiple failures to report to work without notice is employment miscond uct).
Timothy J. Fish, Relator v. Young Men�s Christian Association - YMCA Brainerd, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Timothy J. Fish, Relator v. Young Men�s Christian Association - YMCA Brainerd, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Council, Inc., (stating that employee’s behavior “as a whole” may be considered in determining the propriety of the discharge and qualification for unemployment benefits); -87 (Minn. App. 1984) (adopting a last-straw doctrine in concluding that repeated infractions of employer’s rules demonstrate substantial disregard of employer’s interest and the duties and obligations owed to the employer).
Reddmann v. Kokesch Trucking, Inc. 412 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Reddmann v. Kokesch Trucking, Inc. 412 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
this court adopted the “last straw” doctrine enunciated in Giddens v. Appeal Board of Michigan Employment Security Commission, 4 Mich.App.
Cavalier v. C. Machine Co. 404 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cavalier v. C. Machine Co. 404 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
We first recognized the “last straw doctrine”
Barstow v. Honeywell, Inc. 396 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Barstow v. Honeywell, Inc. 396 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
however, this court adopted the “last straw doctrine” enunciated in the Michigan case of Giddens v. Appeal Board of Michigan Employment Security Commission, 4 Mich.App.
Del Dee Foods, Inc. v. Miller 390 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Del Dee Foods, Inc. v. Miller 390 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kemp v. U.S. Department of Agriculture 385 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kemp v. U.S. Department of Agriculture 385 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gerr v. Target-Fridley 382 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Distinguished Gerr v. Target-Fridley 382 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Abbey v. Contract Programming Specialists, Inc. 377 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Abbey v. Contract Programming Specialists, Inc. 377 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Gustafson v. IRC Industries 374 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Gustafson v. IRC Industries 374 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Gustafson argues that this case should be distinguished from Flahave v. Lang *597 Meat Packing, because he received no notice that his failure to call IRC on December 27, 1984 would result in his discharge and because he did not intentionally harm his employer’s interests.
Drellack v. Inter-County Community Council, Inc. 366 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Drellack v. Inter-County Community Council, Inc. 366 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
this court adopted the “last straw” doctrine enunciated in Giddens v. Appeal Board of Michigan Employment Security Commission, 4 Mich.App.
Jones v. Rosemount, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Jones v. Rosemount, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Campbell v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.
Campbell v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. 345 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Campbell v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. 345 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984