Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rude v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 347 N.W.2d 77.

31 citing documents.

Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Safety, (stating that the purpose of the implied-eonsent statute is to “promote public safety on the highway and aid the proper enforcement of the D.W.I.
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 460 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Kirsch v. Commissioner of Public Safety 440 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kirsch v. Commissioner of Public Safety 440 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
185 (Minn.1986); (Minn.Ct.
Douglas v. Commissioner of Public Safety 385 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Douglas v. Commissioner of Public Safety 385 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
subdivision 2c appears to make the ability to refuse relevant.
Musgjerd v. Commissioner of Public Safety 384 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Musgjerd v. Commissioner of Public Safety 384 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Vievering 383 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Vievering 383 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(probable cause to require a chemical test); -14 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) (same).
Sigfrinius v. Commissioner of Public Safety 378 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sigfrinius v. Commissioner of Public Safety 378 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Rude v. Comm’r of Public Safety, Casci v. Comm’r of Public Safety
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Stiles v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Stiles v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
and mentally incapable of using a phone or meaningfully consulting with an attorney, Laurence’s behavior did not constitute a denial of Stiles’ vindication of his limited right to counsel; and (3) that the issue whether Stiles had the capacity to make a knowing
Clow v. Commissioner of Public Safety 362 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clow v. Commissioner of Public Safety 362 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Casci v. Commissioner of Public Safety 360 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Casci v. Commissioner of Public Safety 360 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
However, and to expand its applicability to a somewhat different defense.
Keane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 360 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Keane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 360 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Johnson v. State, Department of Public Safety
Vertina v. Commissioner of Public Safety 356 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Vertina v. Commissioner of Public Safety 356 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The appellant’s which contains the following language: Respondent contends that under Holtz [ 1 ] these are not objective indications of intoxication, but rather are “indications of consumption of alcohol.” The innovative distinction thus urged contradicts the intended purpose of the implied consent statute, i.e.
Giddings v. Commissioner of Public Safety 354 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Giddings v. Commissioner of Public Safety 354 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kunz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 349 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kunz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 349 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1984