DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rose, 353 N.W.2d 565.

28 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    More specifically, it is not improper for a prosecutor to ask jurors “to place themselves in the victim’s posture as she testified, not during the crime,” for the purpose of “assist[ing] the jury in assessing [the victim’s] credibility.” d 565, 568 (Minn. App. 1984), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    As in State v. Rose , the prosecutor made a “fair comment on [the] evidence.” , 569 (Minn. App. 1984) , review deni ed (Minn. Sept.
  • State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    (concluding where record established that 13-year-old rape victim suffered and will continue to suffer long-lasting mental anguish, prosecuting attorney’s argument pertaining to her mental anguish was fair comment on evidence), revieiv denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State v. Hall 392 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hall 392 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Harmening 376 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Harmening 376 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Peterson 375 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Blackbull 375 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Blackbull 375 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Peterson 375 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Jensen 373 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Jensen 373 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Stephens v. State 369 N.W.2d 603 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Stephens v. State 369 N.W.2d 603 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Taylor 365 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Taylor 365 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Gravley 359 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Gravley 359 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Olsen 359 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Olsen 359 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    954 , 67 L.Ed.2d 119 (1981)
  • State v. Alowonle 356 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Alowonle 356 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    (2) Prosecutors may argue that a “phantom attacker” does not exist; (3) Even if the comments could be interpreted as an implication that defendant failed to call “Jubriel,” under the standards set out in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123 , no reversible error occurred.
  • State v. Nace 354 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Dillard 355 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Nace 354 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Dillard 355 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    at 570 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).