Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reserve Mining Co. v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 364 N.W.2d 411.

34 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Application by Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Application by Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“We refuse to allow an agency, which makes an important decision of this nature without written findings and reasons, to rationalize its action on appeal.”).
Protect Our Minnetonka Parks, Inc., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Reserve Mining Co. v. Minn. Pollution Control Agency , (“The court is interested in de termining the collective reasons of an agency’s action as enunciated by the agency.
Tracie Erickson, Relators v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tracie Erickson, Relators v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But we will reverse as arbitrary and capricious an agency decision that is presented without reasons “because it represents the agency’s will rather than its judgment.” (quotation omitted), review dismissed (Minn. June 10, 1985).
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. City of St. Paul Park 711 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Johnson v. Commissioner of Health 671 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Johnson v. Commissioner of Health 671 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
229 (Minn.App.1987) (“This absence of explanation [for a decision] prompts us to conclude that the commis *924 sion acted arbitrarily and capriciously”); (“an agency decision should normally be supported by written findings and reasons, in more than just a conclusory fashion, ...
Matter of Applications for Authority 490 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In re Authority to Provide Alternative Operator Services in Minnesota 490 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In re Authority to Provide Alternative Operator Services in Minnesota 490 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Applications for Authority 490 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Kandiyohi Co-Op. Elec. Power 455 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re the Complaint by Kandiyohi Cooperative Electric Power Ass'n 455 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re the Complaint by Kandiyohi Cooperative Electric Power Ass'n 455 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Kandiyohi Co-Op. Elec. Power 455 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re Amendment No. 4 to Air Emission Facility Permit No. 2021-85-OT-1 450 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re Amendment No. 4 to Air Emission Facility Permit No. 2021-85-OT-1 450 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(need to include written findings which support agency determination).
City of Minneapolis v. Moe 450 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of Minneapolis v. Moe 450 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
M.T. Properties, Inc. v. Alexander 433 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
M.T. Properties, Inc. v. Alexander 433 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
415 *894 (Minn.Ct.App.1985); see also Wastewater Treatment Facilities, d at 122 .
Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. v. Goldberg 403 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Racetrack, Inc. v. Goldberg 403 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(decisions of magnitude must be supported by written findings and reasons).
City of Barnum v. County of Carlton 386 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
City of Barnum v. County of Carlton 386 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Curtis Oil, d at 883 ; pet.
Northwoods Environmental Institute v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 370 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Burnett v. Stearns County Welfare Board 370 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Northwoods Environmental Institute v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 370 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
this court was asked to determine whether a 1 million fiber per liter limit on the discharge of amphibole fibers was arbitrary and capricious.
Burnett v. Stearns County Welfare Board 370 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Failure to do so evidences the agency’s desire to exercise its will and not its judgment.” Beaty, d at 472
Curtis Oil v. City of North Branch 364 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Curtis Oil v. City of North Branch 364 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sanctioning any such procedure would be unfair to respondent and “runs the risk inherent in any opportunity to rationalize or justify what one has done before.” (citing Honn, d at 416 ).
In Re Authorization to Discharge & Construct Waste-Water Treatment Facilities 366 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Authorization to Discharge & Construct Waste-Water Treatment Facilities 366 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1985

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by