Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Berthiaume v. Berthiaume, 368 N.W.2d 328.
- In re the Matter of: Zoraba Ross v. Angel Raeleen Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In re the Matter of: Zoraba Ross v. Angel Raeleen Smith
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(rejecting the argument that the parties were unable to cooperate “on any level” because evidence supported the district court’s “finding [that] the parties’ inability to cooperate was of relatively recent origin”); -33 (Minn. App. 1985) (determining that evidence supported the district court’s finding, “in spite of current conflict,” that “the parties would be able to cooperate as necessary after the custody issue was put to rest”); (affirming a district court’s j
- A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.)
923 N.W.2d 325
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Berthiaume v. Berthiaume , , 332-33 (Minn. App. 1985).
- In Re the Custody of N.O.K. Jason Michael Krause v. Marissa Lauren Gomez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
In Re the Custody of N.O.K. Jason Michael Krause v. Marissa Lauren Gomez
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The district court found that the statutory presumption of joint legal custody had been rebutted because “[t]he parties have a high level of animosity towards each other, they do not agree on many basic parenting decisions, and they have no methods for resolving conflict.” 11 arguing that “[t]he acrimony between the parties must be shown to affect the child, here there was no showing the child was affected” and that the parties “do not appear to differ substantially in their wishes for the care
- In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Jas v. Rjs 524 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Marriage of J.A.S. v. R.J.S. 524 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Jas v. Rjs 524 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Marriage of J.A.S. v. R.J.S. 524 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- J.M.G. v. J.C.G. 431 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Jmg v. Jcg 431 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
J.M.G. v. J.C.G.
431 N.W.2d 592
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
for rev. denied (Minn. June 12, 1984) (“The trial court abused its discretion in allowing the slow erosion of appellant’s rights without any showing pursuant to the statute that reduced visitation would endanger [the minor child’s] emotional health or impair her emotional development.”); (the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the appellant’s motion for supervised visitation because the record contained “inconclusive evidence” of the alleged abuse).
-
Jmg v. Jcg
431 N.W.2d 592
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
for rev. denied (Minn. June 12, 1984) ("The trial court abused its discretion in allowing the slow erosion of appellant's rights without any showing pursuant to the statute that reduced visitation would endanger [the minor child's] emotional health or impair her emotional development."); (the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the appellant's motion for supervised visitation because the record contained "inconclusive evidence" of the alleged abuse).
- Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke 428 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke
428 N.W.2d 579
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The court concluded that “[gjiven the various weaknesses and strengths of [their] parenting skills * * *, joint physical and legal custody is appropriate,” because it would serve the best interests of the children
- Marriage of Veit v. Veit 413 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Veit v. Veit 413 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 393 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 393 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Hofer v. Hofer 386 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Valento v. Valento 385 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Valento v. Valento 385 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Brauer v. Brauer 384 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Brauer v. Brauer 384 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 382 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter
382 N.W.2d 896
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(joint custody upheld when the parties, although uncooperative during the dissolution proceeding, were able to communicate and cooperate in reaching major decisions about their children).
- Marriage of Brockman v. Brockman 373 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Brockman v. Brockman 373 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985