Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jarvis v. Levine, 418 N.W.2d 139.

104 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of J.L.Y. 596 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Welfare of J.L.Y. 596 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re Conservatorship of Foster 547 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1996
In Re Conservatorship of Foster 547 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1996
In Re the Welfare of J.A.J. 545 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Women of the State v. Gomez 542 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1995
Women of the State v. Gomez 542 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1995
In Jarvis v. Levine, we held that the “right [of privacy] begins with protecting the integrity of one’s own body and includes the right not to have it altered or invaded without consent.”
In Re Public Conservatorship of Foster 535 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re Public Conservatorship of Foster 535 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
148 n. 7 (Minn.1988); (definition of competency), pet.
Matter of Knops 536 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1995
Matter of Knops 536 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1995
( (shot and killed sister); (stabbed wife of man she delusionally believed loved her); (murdered sleeping mother)).
Matter of Martin 527 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Martin 527 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 512 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 512 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(identifying an independent right to privacy in Minn. Const, art. I, §§ 1, 2, 10).
Ascher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 505 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Ascher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 505 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Three years later, however, the court held the right of privacy “begins with protecting the integrity of one’s own body and includes the right not to have it altered or invaded without consent” and specifically referenced Minn. Const, art. I, §§ 1, 2, and 10.
Matter of Blilie 494 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1993
Matter of Blilie 494 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1993
Matter of Blilie 484 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Blilie 484 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
the supreme court held that medical authorities seeking to administer neuroleptic medication to individuals who were involuntarily committed as mentally ill must first obtain pretreatment judicial review.
State, City of Minneapolis v. Reha 483 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1992
State v. Davidson 481 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1992
State v. Davidson 481 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1992
Matter of Chonis 478 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1991
Matter of Chonis 478 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1991
Expert testimony supports the trial court’s
Matter of Zuckerman 477 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Matter of Zuckerman 477 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Matter of Muntner 470 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Matter of Muntner 470 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
the supreme court held that certain procedural guidelines set out in Price v. Sheppard, 307 Minn. 250, 262 , must be followed before a court may authorize the involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication to an incompetent patient who *719 refused the medication.
Matter of Bowers 456 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Bowers 456 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Bonafide 457 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Bonafide 457 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Schauer 450 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Schauer 450 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
the supreme court held that commitment to a mental health institution does not eliminate a person’s right to privacy under the state constitution.
In re the Conservatorship of Edelman 448 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In re the Conservatorship of Edelman 448 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Peterson 446 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Peterson 446 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The district court conducted a Jarvis hearing on the medical director’s request
Matter of Schmidt 443 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
Matter of Schmidt 443 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
In 1988, the legislature amended Minn.Stat.
Matter of Lambert 437 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Steen 437 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Lambert 437 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
the Minnesota Supreme Court *108 determined that certain procedures must be followed before neuroleptic medications may be administered to nonconsenting patients.
In Re Steen 437 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The director of MSH petitioned the district court for authorization to involuntarily treat Steen with neuroleptic medications, pursuant to the Minnesota Supreme Court’s
Matter of Kottke 433 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1988
Matter of Kottke 433 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1988
See, (shot and killed sister); (stabbed wife of man she delusionally believed loved her); (murdered sleeping mother).
Matter of Jarvis 433 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Matter of Jarvis 433 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1988