Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Merseth v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 390 N.W.2d 16.
-
Lang Fur Farms, Inc., et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. , d 16, 18 (Minn. App. 1986) , review denied, (Minn. Aug.
- Tim Johnson, Michael Johnson, Trustee for the Next of Kin of Karen Johnson v. Ironshore Indemnity, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Tim Johnson, Michael Johnson, Trustee for the Next of Kin of Karen Johnson v. Ironshore Indemnity, Inc.
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., d 16, 18 (Minn. App. 1986), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Frey v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 743 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Frey v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
743 N.W.2d 337
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Kabanuk Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Credit General Insurance Co. 553 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Kabanuk Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Credit General Insurance Co.
553 N.W.2d 65
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (doe-trine is limited to those instances where major policy provisions are hidden in the policy and operate to defeat the reasonable expectations of the insured), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Manderfeld 482 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Manderfeld
482 N.W.2d 521
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Merseth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., -18 (Minn.App.1986) (child was “insured” and thus excluded from coverage), pet.
- National Indemnity Co. of Minnesota v. Ness 457 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- National Indemnity Co. of Minnesota v. Ness 457 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Marschall Ex Rel. Marschall v. Reinsurance Ass'n 447 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Marschall Ex Rel. Marschall v. Reinsurance Ass'n 447 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Centennial Insurance Co. v. Zylberberg 422 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Centennial Insurance Co. v. Zylberberg 422 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- John Deere Insurance Co. v. Penna 416 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- John Deere Insurance Co. v. Penna 416 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Morris v. Weiss 414 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Morris v. Weiss
414 N.W.2d 485
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The policy contains no “major exclusions hidden in the definitions section.” See Atwater at 278-79; Merseth by Merseth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., pet for rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
- Ross v. City of Minneapolis 408 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Ross v. City of Minneapolis 408 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Gunderson v. Classified Insurance Corp. 397 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Gunderson v. Classified Insurance Corp.
397 N.W.2d 922
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
We recently rejected a similar argument in Merseth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., pet.
- Park v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 396 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Park v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
396 N.W.2d 900
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
This court has limited the doctrine’s pet.