Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Diesen v. Hessburg, 455 N.W.2d 446.
- Pouliot v. Fitzsimmons 582 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1998
- Pouliot v. Fitzsimmons 582 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1998
- Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 570 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 570 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Hentges v. Thomford 569 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Hentges v. Thomford 569 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Wong v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 562 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Wong v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 562 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Elstrom v. Independent School District No. 270 533 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Elstrom v. Independent School District No. 270 533 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc.
521 N.W.2d 59
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
272 , 93 L.Ed.2d 249 (1986); cert.
- Huyen v. Driscoll 479 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Huyen v. Driscoll 479 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Britton v. Koep 470 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1991
-
Britton v. Koep
470 N.W.2d 518
Minn. 1991
Since the New York Times case, the Minnesota Supreme Court has decided several -claims of defamation of public officials: cert.
- Weissman v. Sri Lanka Curry House, Inc. 469 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Weissman v. Sri Lanka Curry House, Inc. 469 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Lund v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. 467 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Lund v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.
467 N.W.2d 366
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
272 , 93 L.Ed.2d 249 (1986); -51 (Minn.1990), ce rt.
- Hunt v. University of Minnesota 465 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Hunt v. University of Minnesota
465 N.W.2d 88
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Even if Kegler’s statement is a hybrid statement containing both opinion and underlying facts, the statement still cannot be proven false because “when all the underlying predicate facts are considered, with all their conflicting inferences, the state *95 ment is not provable one way or the other.” (Simonett, J., concurring).