Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of M.M., 452 N.W.2d 236.

60 citing documents.

In Re the Adoption of C.H. 548 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Adoption of C.H. 548 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
603 , 121 L.Ed.2d 539 (1992); -39 (Minn.1990) (under various statutory schemes, legislature has endorsed societal goal of strengthening and preserving biological familial structure).
In Re the Welfare of T.P. 492 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of T.P. 492 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
3 (1990) (in the absence of good cause to the contrary, a court shall place the child in the guardianship of the child’s relatives); (recognizing custodial preference to near relatives under the common law).
In Re the Welfare of D.L. 486 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1992
In Re the Welfare of D.L. 486 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1992
In Re the Welfare of D.L. 479 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of D.L. 479 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
There is, however, both longstanding common law which favors providing “custodial preference to near relatives,” and a strong legislative policy of awarding “the permanent care and custody” of a child to a relative.
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
Criticized In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
There is no similarity to the findings criticized by this court in