Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Webb, 440 N.W.2d 426.

854 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen Sam 859 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen Sam 859 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Where there is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, our review on appeal is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Nickolas Mousel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Nickolas Mousel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ayesha Lynn Khan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ayesha Lynn Khan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this court’s review “is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the [factfinder] to reach the verdict which [it] did.”
State of Minnesota v. Caroline Mildred Jochum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Caroline Mildred Jochum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate review of a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is “limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State of Minnesota v. Manuel Hernandes Ayala Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Manuel Hernandes Ayala Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antionee Jarmaine Mixon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antionee Jarmaine Mixon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
4 When considering a claim of insufficient evidence, this court conducts “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State of Minnesota v. Karen Marie O�Farrell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Nikia Kylene Balen. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Karen Marie O�Farrell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Nikia Kylene Balen. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
his court’s “review of the sufficiency of the evidence is ‘limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.’” (quoting State v. Webb, 4 ).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Kaupang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Kaupang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Juan Jasso, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Juan Jasso, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gerard McNeal, and Gerard McNeal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gerard McNeal, and Gerard McNeal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate review of a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is “limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the 14 jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State of Minnesota v. Sergey Alekseyevich Porada Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Sergey Alekseyevich Porada Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Farah O. Farah Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Farah O. Farah Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Bernard Miles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Bernard Miles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
When addressing a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge, our review “is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Onokwuozo Onyemekeihia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Onokwuozo Onyemekeihia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION In considering a claim of insufficient evidence, our review is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the conviction, is sufficient to allow the jurors to reach the verdict 2 that they did.1
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate review of a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence involves “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was 18 sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State of Minnesota v. Rebecca Brynetta Passon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Rebecca Brynetta Passon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION I. Standard of review In considering the sufficiency of evidence, our review “is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Suzanne Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Suzanne Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
On a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, “our review on appeal is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State v. Fairbanks 842 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2014
State v. Fairbanks 842 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2014
State v. Tayari-Garrett 841 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Tayari-Garrett 841 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Essex 838 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Essex 838 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, appellate review “is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
State v. McElroy 828 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by